Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004057.pub3

Roberts 2002.

Methods RCT
Participants N=64; Mean age (yrs): 39.2; Gender (female): 35%; Diagnosis: acute LBP, no LBP in previous 6 months, at least 3 days of work. Unclear whether sciatica was included. 
 Setting: Primary Care
Interventions (E) 'Back Home' booklet with biopsychosocial information and empowering statement of GP (N=35); 
 (C) Usual care (N=28)
Outcomes Back pain specific functional status: 
 Aberdeen Low Back Pain Scale at 2 days, 2 wk, 3 mo, 6 mo, 1 yr: (E) 42.7 (11.9), 37.7 (14.8), 14.6 (17.6), 14.7 (16.1), 11.0 (14.2); (C) 42.6 (13.6), 35.6 (15.9), 14.4 (17.6), 8.6 (10.1), 8.1 (9.6)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk  
Allocation concealment? High risk C ‐ Inadequate
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ patients? Unclear risk Unclear from text
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ providers? High risk  
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors? Unclear risk Unclear from text
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs during intervention? Low risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs during follow‐up? High risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis? Low risk  
Similarity at baseline characteristics? High risk  
Co‐interventions avoided or similar? High risk  
Compliance acceptable? High risk