Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 16;3(Suppl 1):1758–1763. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz082

Table 2.

Effect of AI or NS breeding and RNG or MDW grazing on feedlot performance of calf-feds1

Treatment P-value2
AI-MDW AI-RNG NS-MDW NS-RNG SEM BRD GRZ B × G JDOB
Initial 78 d of feeding
n 24 18 32 30
 Arrival BW, kg 272 260 272 242 7.26 0.21 <0.01 0.11 <0.01
 Initial BW3, kg 321a 313a 324a 280b 8.64 0.10 <0.01 0.01 0.02
 ADG, kg/d 1.92 2.09 1.89 1.89 0.06 0.04 0.12 0.11 -
 DMI, kg/d 10.6 10.9 9.71 9.48 0.36 <0.01 0.83 0.36 -
 G:F 0.177 0.183 0.193 0.198 0.008 0.01 0.40 0.95 -
Last 105 d of feeding
n 17 10 24 24
 Reimplant BW, kg 470a 476a 458a 413b 10.9 <0.01 0.04 <0.01 -
 ADG, kg/d 1.51 1.64 1.63 1.56 0.07 0.69 0.62 0.10 -
 DMI, kg/d 10.4 10.4 10.6 10.3 0.36 0.98 0.55 0.66 -
 G:F 0.144b 0.159a 0.156a 0.153ab 0.006 0.73 0.24 0.08 -

abMeans within a row lacking a common superscript differ (P < 0.10).

1Calves entered feedlot 2 wk after weaning.

2BRD = breeding treatment main effect; GRZ = grazing treatment main effect; B × G = breeding × grazing treatment interaction; JDOB = calf Julian date of birth included in model when significant (P < 0.10).

3Calf weight at the start of finishing diet.