Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD000364. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000364.pub4

Atmar 1989.

Methods Randomisation: no details 
 Blinding: double‐blind, but no details of method used 
 Number excluded: no details 
 Withdrawals: 2 (1 from each group due to extraneous viral infection) 
 Baseline characteristics: antibody levels to influenza A and B measured and baseline lung function tests
Participants Location: Houston, TX 
 Participants: 19 healthy adult volunteers with a history of asthma. 17 had data analysed, 11 given vaccine and 6 placebo 
 Asthma definition and severity: history of intermittent wheezing, 15 patients using intermittent or continuous bronchodilator therapy 
 Exclusion criteria: acute respiratory illness, allergy to egg, pregnancy
Interventions Vaccine type: intranasal bivalent (H3N2+H1N1) influenza A vaccine. 0.25 mL per nostril 
 Placebo: allantoic fluid, 0.25 mL per nostril
Outcomes Early: lung function tests on days 0, 3 or 4, and 7; performed in the mornings (no bronchodilators taken before testing). The authors regarded a reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 13% (or greater) from baseline to be clinically significant 
 Bronchodilator therapy and hospital admission were also reported
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Generated by statistical group in General Clinical Research Centre
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind but no details of similarity between placebo and active vaccine
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No details
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No drop‐outs reported