Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD000364. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000364.pub4

Govaert 1992.

Methods Randomisation: stratified by 4 morbidity categories 
 Blinding: double‐blind 
 Exclusions: those in high‐risk groups (however, 25 asthmatic patients were included in the study) 
 Withdrawals: 0 but 1 patient in the placebo group had incomplete data 
 Baseline characteristics: no data
Participants Location: Netherlands 
 Patients were all aged 60 years or over. Of the 1838 patients participating in the study 25 had asthma (no details of definition or severity but severe cases likely to have been excluded). Of these, 14 received vaccine and 11 received placebo 
 Exclusion criteria: age under 60 years, living in old peoples' care homes or nursing homes, belonging to a high‐risk group (interpreted differently by general practitioners)
Interventions Vaccination type: purified split vaccine H1N1, H3N2, B45/90, B1/87 given intramuscularly 
 Placebo: physiological saline intramuscularly
Outcomes Early: adverse reactions (recalled by the patients after 4 weeks) 
 Late: serologically confirmed influenza
Notes No serologically confirmed influenza was seen in either the immunised or the placebo group
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Stratified randomisation scheme
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Next consecutive numbered syringe used
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Saline placebo but no further details
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Questionnaires analysed by researchers blind to vaccination status
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 1791/1838 completed