. 2017 Mar 13;17(6):695–709. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201600225

Table 7.

Comparison between the optimized kinetic parameters estimated from the kinetic model of the present study and those obtained in the literature during production of citric acid from yeasts and molds cultivated in various carbon sources

Optimized parameter value	Present study	Literature
μ _max (h^–1)	0.17–0.44	0.21 (Briffaud and Engasser 55)^a
		0.24 (Wojtatowicz et al. 67)^b
		0.28 (Klasson et al. 56)^a
		0.18 (Arzumanov et al. 68)^c
		0.18–0.36 (Papanikolaou and Aggelis 69)^d
		0.10–0.15 (Papanikolaou et al. 59)^a
		0.24 (Anastassiadis et al. 33)^e
		0.15–0.19 (Papanikolaou et al. 21)^f
		0.07–0.12 (Karasu‐Yalcin et al. 70)^a
		0.26 (Karasu‐Yalcin et al. 70)^g
Y_X/Sugar (g/g) (Y_X/Glycerol g/g)	0.83–0.92	0.37 (Briffaud and Engasser 55)^a
		0.40 (Klasson et al. 56)^a
		0.41 (Moresi 26)^a
		0.29–0.30 (Papanikolaou and Aggelis 69)^d
		0.27–0.70 (Papanikolaou et al. 59)^a
		0.21–0.29 (Papanikolaou et al. 21)^f
Y_X/N (g/g)	29.86–33.19	40 (Briffaud and Engasser 55)^a
		45 (Hossain et al. 71)^h ^, ⁱ
		35 (Rane and Sims 47)^a
		19.67 (Arzumanov et al. 68)^c
		31.97–33.62 (Papanikolaou and Aggelis 69)^d
		46.2–47.3 (Papanikolaou et al. 59)^a
		47.62–67.72 (Papanikolaou et al. 21)^f
X_max (g/L)	4.06–4.22	8.5–12.5 (Klasson et al. 56)^a
		12.0–17.5 (Arzumanov et al. 68)^c
		5.89 (Papanikolaou and Aggelis 69)^d
		5.0–6.7 (Papanikolaou et al. 21)^f
		8.78–11.09 (Karasu‐Yalcin et al. 72)^a
Y_Cit/Sugar (g/g) (Y_Cit/Glycerol g/g)	0.66–0.96	0.60–0.75 (Briffaud and Engasser 55)^a
		0.71 (Klasson et al. 56)^a
		0.48 (Gutierrez et al. 57)^j
		0.50–0.60 (Mayilvahanan et al. 73)^k
		0.62–0.63 (Papanikolaou and Aggelis 69)^d
		0.72–0.82 (Papanikolaou et al. 21)^f
		0.14–0.38 (Karasu‐Yalcin et al. 70)^g
		0.28–0.39 (Karasu‐Yalcin et al. 72)^a
q _Cit (g/(g h))	0.11–9.74	0.01 (Maddox and Kingston 74)^a
		0.051 (Klasson et al. 56)^a
		0.02 (Roukas and Kotzekidou 75)^l
		3.05 × 10⁻² (Papanikolaou and Aggelis 69)^d
		0.120 (Kamzolova et al. 41)^c
		0.127 (Kamzolova et al. 42)^m
		1.29–1.64 × 10⁻² (Papanikolaou et al. 59)^a
		1.33–2.12×10⁻² (Papanikolaou et al. 21)^f
		0.009–0.030 (Karasu‐Yalcin et al. 72)^a

Values presented in the literature were in most of the cases the optimized ones that derived from the application of various kinetic models.

Yarrowia (Candida – Saccharomycopsis) lipolytica on glucose.

Y. lipolytica on starch hydrolysates.

Y. lipolytica on ethanol.

Y. lipolytica on biodiesel‐derived glycerol.

C. oleophila on glucose.

Y. lipolytica on OMW‐glucose blends.

Y. lipolytica on fructose.

Aspergillus niger on sucrose.

ⁱ

A. niger on lactose.

C. guillermondii on galactose.

A. niger on molasses.

A. niger on brewery sugar residues.

Y. lipolytica on rapeseed oil.