. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 4.

Published in final edited form as: Remote Sens Environ. 2016 Apr 28;Volume 185(Iss 2):46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.04.008

Table 2:

OLI surface reflectance APU scores expressed in 10⁻³ reflectance (compared to TM and ETM+ surface reflectance APU by Claverie et al. (2015) using Aqua MODIS BRDF and spectrally adjusted surface reflectance CMG product as reference, the OLI surface reflectance was aggregated over the CMG. Band number corresponds to OLI band number designation and equivalent TM/ETM+ bands were reported.

OLI Band	TM LEDAPS (Claverie et al., 2015)			ETM+ LEDAPS (Claverie et al., 2015)			OLI This work
	A	P	U	A	P	U	A	P	U
2	7	9	11	9	7	12	2	6	6
3	1	9	9	6	9	11	3	6	7
4	9	10	14	1	9	9	1	6	6
5	5	17	17	3	14	15	2	12	12
7	1	14	14	5	15	16	9	11	14

OLI Band	TM LEDAPS (Claverie et al., 2015)			ETM+ LEDAPS (Claverie et al., 2015)			OLI This work
	A	P	U	A	P	U	A	P	U
2	7	9	11	9	7	12	2	6	6
3	1	9	9	6	9	11	3	6	7
4	9	10	14	1	9	9	1	6	6
5	5	17	17	3	14	15	2	12	12
7	1	14	14	5	15	16	9	11	14

OLI Band	TM LEDAPS (Claverie et al., 2015)			ETM+ LEDAPS (Claverie et al., 2015)			OLI This work
	A	P	U	A	P	U	A	P	U
2	7	9	11	9	7	12	2	6	6
3	1	9	9	6	9	11	3	6	7
4	9	10	14	1	9	9	1	6	6
5	5	17	17	3	14	15	2	12	12
7	1	14	14	5	15	16	9	11	14

OLI Band	TM LEDAPS (Claverie et al., 2015)			ETM+ LEDAPS (Claverie et al., 2015)			OLI This work
	A	P	U	A	P	U	A	P	U
2	7	9	11	9	7	12	2	6	6
3	1	9	9	6	9	11	3	6	7
4	9	10	14	1	9	9	1	6	6
5	5	17	17	3	14	15	2	12	12
7	1	14	14	5	15	16	9	11	14