Table 2.
A review of selected deliberative governance frameworks and their conceptual contribution to CSA.
Framework | Definition | Novelty | Core principles | Contribution to CSA |
---|---|---|---|---|
Constructive technology assessment | “A notion of shared responsibilities for managing technology in society, with all actors working toward the CTA goals of learning, reflexivity, and anticipation.” (Schot and Rip, 1996) | Inclusion of a broad range of actors in the design of technologies. | • Reflexivity • Co-production • Modulation and learning • Anticipation. | • The use of bridging events. • Inclusion of a broader range of perspectives. |
Anticipatory governance | “A broad-based capacity extended through society that can act on a variety of inputs to manage emerging knowledge-based technologies while such management is still possible” (Guston, 2014) | Closer link to the process of technological development. | • Anticipation • Foresight • Engagement • Integration | • Integration of natural and social sciences. • Taking an incremental approach to governance. |
Responsible research and innovation | “Taking care of the future through collective stewardship of science and innovation in the present” (Stilgoe et al., 2013) | Greater attention to normativity. Innovation to tackle grand challenges. | • Anticipation • Reflexivity • Inclusion • Responsiveness | • Directing innovation towards “normative anchor points” (von Schomberg, 2011) • Importance of embedding reflexivity and maintaining responsiveness. |
Authors’ elaboration.