Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Immunol. 2019 May 14;49(6):918–927. doi: 10.1002/eji.201847851

Aspergillus fumigatus corneal infection is regulated by chitin synthases and by neutrophil–derived acidic mammalian chitinase

Steven de Jesus Carrion 1,*, Serena Abbondante 2,*, Heather L Clark 1, Michaela E Marshall 2, Isabelle Mouyna 3, Anne Beauvais 3, Yan Sun 1, Patricia R Taylor 1, Sixto M Leal Jr 1, Brittany Armstrong 1, William Carrera 1, Jean-Paul Latge 3, Eric Pearlman 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6999821  NIHMSID: NIHMS1064386  PMID: 30903663

Abstract

Aspergillus fumigatus is an important cause of pulmonary and systemic infections in immune compromised individuals, and of corneal ulcers and blindness in immune competent patients. To examine the role of chitin synthases in Aspergillus corneal infection, we analyzed Aspergillus mutants of chitin synthase family 1 and family 2, and found that compared with the parent strain, the quadruple mutants from both families were more readily killed by neutrophils in vitro, and that both also exhibited impaired hyphal growth in the cornea. Further, inhibition of chitin synthases using Nikkomycin Z enhanced neutrophil killing in vitro and in vivo in a murine model of A. fumigatus corneal infection. Acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) is mostly produced by macrophages in asthmatic lungs; however, we now demonstrate that neutrophils are a major source of AMCase, which inhibits hyphal growth. In A. fumigatus corneal infection, neutrophils are the major source of AMCase, and addition of AMCase inhibitors or adoptive transfer of neutrophils from AMCase−/− mice resulted in impaired hyphal killing. Together, these findings identify chitin synthases as important fungal virulence factors and neutrophil-derived AMCase as an essential mediator of host defense.

Keywords: Acidic mammalian chitinase, Aspergillus fumigatus, Corneal infection, Chitin synthase, Keratitis, Neutrophil

Introduction

The incidence of fungal infections has been increasing worldwide, especially those caused by Candida yeast and by filamentous fungi including Aspergillus fumigatus, which is ubiquitous in the environment [1, 2]. A. fumigatus is an important cause of systemic and pulmonary disease, especially in immunosuppressed individuals; however, Aspergillus and Fusarium molds also other cause blinding corneal infections in immune competent individuals worldwide [3]. The major risk factor is ocular trauma caused by airborne particles with attached conidia (spores) or conidiophores, which penetrate the tight junctions of the corneal epithelium and enter the corneal stroma. Once in the stroma, conidia germinate and form hyphae, which can migrate throughout the stroma and into the anterior chamber and posterior eye. Hyphae activate resident macrophages to produce CXC chemokines that mediate recruitment of neutrophils from peripheral, limbal capillaries. This results in loss of corneal clarity, opacification, and visual impairment, and in severe cases, blindness [4].

We reported that neutrophils are the predominant cells in patients with corneal ulcers caused by Aspergillus or Fusarium [5], and that neutrophils are the first cells recruited to corneas in murine models of Aspergillus and Fusarium infected mice [6, 7]. Neutrophils play an essential role in regulating hyphal growth in the cornea by oxidative and nonoxidative mechanisms, including limiting iron and zinc availability to hyphae. Inhibition of growth by nutrient deprivation is also termed nutritional immunity [810].

Another potential target on pathogenic fungi is the cell wall, and we showed a role for β-1,3 glucan and α-mannose, which activate the c-type lectins Dectin-1 and Dectin-2, respectively [11]. In that study, we also showed that in the absence of the RodA hydrophobin protein on conidia, the host response to cell wall components was more rapid, leading to clearance of the organisms.

In fungi, chitin forms the inner, rigid layer of the cell wall, and chitin fibrils covalently attach to β (1, 3)-glucans [12, 13]. Chitin is a polymer of β-(1-4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, which is synthesized from UDP N-acetylglucosamine by transmembrane chitin synthases. In addition to fungi, chitin is also present in the cyst walls of amoebae, the exoskeleton of crustaceans and insects, and in nematodes, making it the most abundant polysaccharide in nature after cellulose [1416]. However, although mammals do not have chitin, mammals can produce enzymatically active Acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase, Chia1) and chitotriosidase (CHIT1), which can hydrolyze chitin in the environment [17, 18]. In humans, AMCase is produced by macrophages, eosinophils, and epithelial cells in asthmatic lungs, where it is thought to contribute to disease severity [1922].

In the current study, we show that human and murine neutrophils are an important source of AMCase, Using a well-established murine model of A. fumigatus corneal infection [6, 9, 23] we show that neutrophil AMCase and chitin synthases play an important role in limiting fungal growth during A. fumigatus infection.

Results

Nikkomycin Z inhibition of chitin synthase activity

Transmembrane chitin synthases (CHS) convert UDP-N-acetylglucosamine to chitin. As a first approach to examine the role of chitin synthases in A. fumigatus killing by neutrophils, hyphae were incubated with Nikkomycin Z, which is a specific inhibitor of chitin synthase enzymatic activity [24]. Human peripheral blood neutrophils from healthy volunteers were incubated with the A. fumigatus RFP-expressing strain Af293-RFP in the presence of Nikkomycin Z, and fungal mass was quantified as total RFP.

As shown in Fig. 1A, the fungal mass was significantly lower when incubated with neutrophils compared with hyphae incubated in RPMI alone; however, when Nikkomycin Z was added to the culture with neutrophils, hyphal growth was significantly inhibited compared with neutrophils alone. There was no effect of 1 μM Nikkomycin Z on hyphal growth in the absence of neutrophils. To examine the effect of Nikkomycin Z in vivo, we used a well-characterized model of A. fumigatus corneal infection [6, 8, 11]. Corneas of C57BL/6 mice were infected with Af293-RFP, and after 6 h, mice were injected intrastromally with either Nikkomycin Z or with vehicle alone. As shown in Fig. 1BD, there was significantly less RFP hyphae in infected corneas given Nikkomycin Z compared with those given vehicle alone. Consistent with this finding, there was also lower viability of Nikkomycin Z - treated corneas as determined by CFU.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Nikkomycin Z inhibition of A. fumigatus chitin synthesis. (A) Human neutrophils were incubated with A. fumigatus for 16 h in the presence or absence of neutrophils and Nikkomycin Z (Nikko). Fungal viability was detected by XTT and quantified by fluorimetry and represented as fungal mass (three biological replicates representing three repeat experiments). (B) Representative corneas showing hyphal growth of RFP expressing A. fumigatus 48 h infected C57BL/6 mice that were given systemic Nikkomycin Z or vehicle control (original magnification is ×20). Quantification of A. fumigatus RFP fluorescence (C) and CFU (D) of 48 h infected eyes. A: mean ± SD of neutrophils from a single donor (four technical replicates), which was repeated using a second donor. (C, D) Data points represent individual infected corneas from 6–10 mice per group; experiments were repeated twice with similar results. p values were determined following ANOVA analyses and a Tukey posttest (A) or t test to compare two groups (C, D). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001.

Collectively, these observations demonstrate that loss of chitin integrity in the cell wall results in increased A. fumigatus susceptibility to neutrophil-mediated killing in vitro and in infected corneas.

Chitin synthases are required for resistance to neutrophil killing

A. fumigatus has eight CHS genes, which belong to two families based on sequence data—family 1, CHSA, B, and C, and family 2 (CSMA, CSMB, CHSF, and CHSD), which work cooperatively to synthesize chitin [25, 26]. Therefore, as a second approach to examine the importance of chitin integrity on A. fumigatus resistance to neutrophil killing, we incubated human neutrophils with chitin synthase mutants ΔChsA/B/C/G (family 1) or with ΔCSMA/CSMB/D/F (family 2), and measured the metabolic activity of hyphae using the cell viability dye XTT. As shown in Fig. 2A, viability of Ku80 hyphae was impaired in the presence of neutrophils compared with RPMI alone; however, chitin synthase mutants exhibited significantly less viability of the following incubation with neutrophils compared to the parent Ku80 strain.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Role of chitin synthases in A. fumigatus survival in corneal infection. (A) Human neutrophils incubated 16 h with either WT Ku80, chitin synthase Family 1 mutants ΔChsA/B/C/G, or Family 2 mutants ΔChsE/Eb/D/F. Fungal viability was measured using the XTT viability dye. (B) The 48 h infected eyes were dissected and plated onto SDA agar plates overnight to determine CFU (corneas are 3 mm diameter). (C) Representative images of 24 h and 48 h infected corneas from C57BL/6 mice with Ku80, ΔChsA/B/C/G, or ΔChsE/Eb/D/F strains. (D) Quantification of percentage corneal opacity in 24 h and 48 h infected corneas. p values were determined following ANOVA analyses and a Tukey posttest. * = <0.05, ** = <0.001, *** = <0.0001. (A) Data are representative of two donors; (B, D) one representative experiment of three repeat experiments using 5–10 mice per group in each experiment where each data point represents an individual infected cornea.

To examine the role of A. fumigatus chitin synthases during infection, ΔchsA/B/C/G and ΔCSMA/CSMB/D/F conidia were injected into C57BL/6 mouse corneas, and after 48 h, eyes were homogenized and fungal survival was quantified by CFU. We found significantly lower CFU in the chitin synthase mutants compared with the parent Ku80 strain (Fig. 2B), indicating that normal chitin synthesis is required for A. fumigatus hyphal growth in the cornea. Consistent with lower CFU, we observed significantly less corneal disease (measured by corneal opacity) caused by ΔCSMA/CSMB/D/F strain compared with Ku80, although there was no difference between the ΔchsA/B/C/G and Ku80 (Fig. 2CE). These findings indicate a more important role for family 1 chitin synthases during corneal infection. We also found no difference in virulence between Ku80 and single chitin synthase mutants (data not shown), indicating functional redundancy among these chitin synthases.

Neutrophil AMCase inhibits growth of Aspergillus hyphae in vitro

To determine if AMCase has a direct role in the ability of neutrophils to inhibit A. fumigatus hyphal growth, human peripheral blood neutrophils were incubated with A. fumigatus hyphae in the presence of the chitinase inhibitors Bisdionin C, which has broad activity for chitinases, or Bisdionin F, which is specific for AMCase [27]. Neutrophils were incubated with live A. fumigatus hyphae for 16 h, and fungal mass was measured using XTT [28].

We found significantly less hyphal mass when neutrophils were incubated with growing hyphae, (Fig. 3A); However, in the presence of Bisdionin F or Bisdionin C, fungal mass was significantly higher, indicating impaired neutrophil killing, thereby indicating that neutrophil AMCase has an important role in killing A. fumigatus hyphae.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

AMCase dependent A. fumigatus hyphal killing in vitro. (A) Peripheral blood human neutrophils incubated 16 h with hyphae in the presence of the AMCase inhibitor Bisdionin F (BisF) or the general chitinase inhibitor Bisdionin C (BisC). (B) Bone marrow neutrophils from C57BL/6 or AMCase−/− mice incubated 16h with A. fumigatus hyphae. Viable hyphae were quantified using the XTT viability stain (A), and total chitin content was quantified using Calcofluor white (B). (A) Data are mean ± SD from a single donor; similar results were found using a second donor; (B), mean ± SD of neutrophils pooled from 3–5 mice per group. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. p values were derived by ANOVA analyses with a Tukey posttest. *<0.05, **<0.001, ***<0.0001.

As a second approach to examine the role of neutrophil AMCase in hyphal killing, we isolated neutrophils from the bone marrow of AMCase−/− (Chit1−/−) mice, which were generated by Dr. Lori Fitz [29], and incubated them with growing hyphae. As shown in Fig. 3B, hyphal growth was significantly lower in the presence of bone marrow neutrophils from C57BL/6 mice compared with neutrophils from AMCase−/− mice. These combined studies demonstrate an important role for AMCase in neutrophil killing of A. fumigatus hyphae.

Neutrophils are the predominant source of AMCase in A. fumigatus infected corneas

To determine the source of AMCase in A. fumigatus corneal infection, corneas of C57BL/6 mice were injected with 4 × 104 A. fumigatus conidia in 2 μL PBS. After 24 h, infected corneas were dissected and homogenized, and AMCase was detected either by Western blot analysis, or by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to identify AMCase and Ly6G+ neutrophils. In addition, bone marrow neutrophils from naïve C57BL/6 mice were stimulated in vitro with AspHE, and AMCase protein was detected by Western blot.

As shown in Fig. 4A, AMCase was detected in bone marrow neutrophils from C57BL/6 mice, and increased following incubation with Aspergillus extracts. AMCase was not detected in corneas from uninfected (naïve) mice (Fig. 4B), which have resident macrophages, but no neutrophils; however, AMCase is clearly present in infected corneas after neutrophils have been recruited 24 h postinfection. Although AMCase is produced by macrophages in the lungs [17], we reported that neutrophils are the predominant cell type recruited to infected corneas at early time points [6, 8, 11].

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Neutrophil production of AMCase in A. fumigatus corneal infection. (A) Production of AMCase in bone marrow neutrophils from naïve C57BL/6 that were incubated with A. fumigatus Af293 hyphal extract (AspHE). (B) Western blot of isolated corneas from naïve C57BL/6 mice and of corneas dissected 24 h postinfection with 4 × 104 A. fumigatus Af293 (two separate corneas). (C) Corneal sections (5 μm) 48 h postinfection incubated with antibodies to Ly6G+ (NIMP-R14) to identify neutrophils, AMCase and a merged image (original magnification is x400). (D) Colocalization of NIMP-R14 and AMCase staining in uninfected (naïve) and infected mice, and quantified using Image J software. Data are mean ± SD of three infected mice. (E, F) Representative flow cytometry plot of total cells from infected corneas (C57Bl/6 mice) showing total cells (E) and CD45+ cells (F).(EpCam: epithelial cell marker). Flow cytometry showing F/480 macrophage staining is shown in Supporting Information Fig. 1. (G) Quantification of total neutrophils from infected corneas from C57Bl/6 and AMCase−/− mice. (D) Mean ± SD of 10 fields each of two corneas. (G) Data points represent total neutrophils from five or six individual corneas per group. This experiment was repeated twice with similar results. Statistical significance in D and F was determined by Students t test to compare two groups.

To determine if neutrophils are the major source of AMCase in infected corneas, 5 μm corneal sections were immunostained with antibodies to Ly6G and AMCase. Figure 4C and D show that AMCase colocalized with Ly6G+ neutrophils in the corneal stroma of infected mice, whereas naïve mice, which do not have neutrophils, were negative for AMCase. Consistent with this finding, we also examined infiltrating CD45+ cells by flow cytometry, and found that 80–90% of the recruited CD45+ cells were Ly6G+ neutrophils and 10–20% were Ly6C+ monocytes (Fig. 4E, F), with <3% F4/80+ macrophages (Supporting Information Fig. 1). Also, there was no difference in the total number of Ly6G+ neutrophils recruited to the corneas of AMCase−/− compared with C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 4G), indicating that AMCase has no role in recruiting neutrophils to infected corneas.

Taken together, these findings demonstrate that neutrophils are the major source of AMCase in A. fumigatus corneal infection.

Neutrophil AMCase regulates A. fumigatus hyphal growth in infected corneas

To ascertain if AMCase has a role in regulating A. fumigatus hyphal growth in infected corneas, corneas of C57BL/6 and AMCase−/− mice were infected with dsRed expressing Af293, and after 48 h, hyphal mass and fungal viability were quantified. We found no significant difference in corneal opacification between C57BL/6 and AMCase−/− mice; however, there was significantly higher RFP hyphae and CFU in infected AMCase−/− mice compared with C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 5AC, Supporting Information Fig. 2).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The role of AMCase in A. fumigatus corneal infection. (A) Representative corneas from C57BL/6 and AMCase−/− mice 48 h after infection with RFP expressing Af293 (corneas are 3 mm diameter); quantification of RFP fluorescence (B) and CFU (C) in infected corneas. (D) Intravenous injection of bone marrow neutrophils from C57BL/6 or AMCase−/− mice into recipient CD18−/− mice. (E) CFU from AMCase−/− mice 48 h postinfection with the quadruple chitin synthase mutant ΔChsE/Eb/D/F compared or with the parent KU80 strain. (B–E) Each data point represents a single infected cornea with 5–6 mice per group in each experiment (RFP data were obtained from all 15 mice in a single experiment, whereas CFU were obtained from 5–6 mice per group. These experiments were repeated twice with similar results. Significance was determined by Students t test to compare two groups. p values are: *<0.05, ***<0.0001.

To examine more directly the role for neutrophil AMCase in infection, we used CD18−/− mice as recipients, as circulating CD18−/− neutrophils are unable to extravasate to inflamed tissues due to their inability to form CD11a/CD18 or CD11b/CD18 heterodimeric integrins (LFA1, MAC1). Bone marrow neutrophils were isolated from C57BL/6 and AMCase−/− mice by negative bead selection, and 4 × 106 cells were injected intravenously in 150 μL 4 h after corneal infection with Af293-RFP. Corneas were examined 24 h later, and CFU were quantified. As shown in Fig. 5D, CFU in corneas of recipient mice given AMCase−/− neutrophils was significantly higher than those given C57BL/6 neutrophils.

Finally, as AMCase targets chitin, and the chitin synthase quadruple mutants have less chitin [26], we predicted that the chitin synthase mutants would grow to the same extent as the parent strain in the absence of AMCase. We therefore infected corneas of AMCase−/− mice with either the ΔChsE/Eb/D/F quadruple mutant that induced less disease in C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 2) or with the parent KU80 strain, and examined CFU 48 h postinfection. We found that as anticipated, there was no difference in CFU between the ΔChsE/Eb/D/F and KU80 in AMCase−/− mice (Fig. 5E).

Taken together, these observations indicate that neutrophil derived AMCase regulates hyphal growth in A. fumigatus corneal infection by targeting cell wall chitin.

Discussion

The results of our study clearly demonstrate an essential role for chitin synthases and for neutrophil derived AMCase in the pathogenesis of A. fumigatus infection. The requirement for chitin synthases is supported by the findings that pharmacological inhibition or genetic deletion of chitin synthases results in reduction of A. fumigatus survival in the presence of neutrophils, and a loss of virulence in an animal model of corneal infection. Consistent with the role for chitin, we show that the enzymatically active chitinase AMCase has a nonredundant role in the keratitis model where neutrophils are the major players, and in an in vitro neutrophil hyphal killing assay.

Latge and coworkers demonstrated that A. fumigatus cell wall chitin is synthesized by eight chitin synthases (Chs) belonging to two families, Chs A, B, C, and G in family 1 and Chs F, D, CSMA, and CSMB in family 2. The differences between these Chs families is based on organization of the enzymatic region in relation to the transmembrane regions of the proteins [25, 30], and mutants deleted in Chs genes of family 1 (ΔchsA/B/C/G), or family 2 (ΔchsE/Eb/D/F) had impaired chitin synthase activity that correlates with a restructuring of the cell wall [12, 25, 26]. In the pulmonary aspergillosis model, where mice are immunosuppressed, there was no difference between family 1 and family 2 Chs mutants compared with the Ku80 parent strain of A. fumigatus [30]. However, those findings are in contrast to the current study, where family 1 and family 2 Chs mutants were more susceptible than the parent Ku80 to neutrophil killing in vitro, and were less virulent in infected corneas. Interestingly, the ΔchsE/Eb/D/F family 2 mutants induced less corneal disease than the ΔchsA/B/C/G family 1 mutants despite there being no difference in CFU recovered from the cornea.

In support of this observation, we also showed that A. fumigatus hyphae grown in the presence of Nikkomycin Z were more susceptible to neutrophil killing, and in vivo injection of Nikkomycin Z at the time of infection resulted in impaired fungal growth. Nikkomycin Z is a potent inhibitor of chitin synthases [13], where it impairs growth by inhibiting the chitin synthases Chs1 and Chs3 as shown for Candida albIcans [24, 31]. A. fumigatus is also sensitive to Nikkomycin Z, especially when used together with other anti-fungal agents [32]. We show here that inhibition of chitin synthesis augments susceptibility to the neutrophil anti-fungal response.

Although we have yet to determine the underlying reason for the increased susceptibility of those mutants to neutrophils, it may relate to differences in the size of the chitin microfibrils, as ΔchsE/Eb/D/F mutants have short-chitin microfibrils compared with longer chitin microfibrils in the ΔchsA/B/C/G mutants [30]. It may also relate to the relative levels of chitin and the deacetylated form of chitin (chitosan) in the cell wall. Smaller chitin fragments were reported by Elias et al. to induce IL-10 production by macrophages compared with larger fragments that induce proinflammatory responses in macrophages and in murine models of pulmonary inflammation [14, 3336]; however, Levitz and coworkers showed that chitosan rather than chitin activates the NLRP3 inflammasome to secrete IL-1β in LPS–-stimulated macrophages when given as a second signal, and that smaller rather than larger chitosan particles are more proinflammatory [37]. In a more recent study, van de Veerdonk et al. showed that chitin must be bound to IgG to induce either an anti-inflammatory IL-1Ra response through FCRγRII/Syk activation, or to enhance IL-1β production in the presence of LPS or other TLR ligands [38].

In live organisms, it is also possible that disruption of the chitin cell wall results in increased penetrability of ROS and neutrophil antimicrobial products. We reported that neutrophils regulate growth of Aspergillus hyphae in vitro and in infected corneas by oxidative and also by nonoxidative mechanisms, including sequestering iron and zinc binding proteins; however, neutrophil extra-cellular traps were not required for hyphal killing in this model [8, 9, 23, 39]. Results of the current study identify AMCase as an additional regulator of hyphal growth by neutrophils, as inhibition of AMCase using Bisdionin F or Bisdionin C results in impaired fungal killing by neutrophils in vitro. Further, AMCase−/− neutrophils were impaired in their ability to inhibit hyphal growth in vitro and during corneal infection. It is possible that short-chain chitins are more readily degraded by AMCase than long- chain chitins, thereby facilitating the penetration of neutrophil oxidative and nonoxidative mediators to the fungal cell membrane and into the cytoplasm.

Despite the impaired fungal killing in corneas of AMCase−/− mice, we found no significant difference in corneal opacification between these and C57BL/6 mice. This is likely because the number neutrophils recruited infected corneas was the same as C57BL/6 mice, and the absence of AMCase has no effect on neutrophil production of ROS or proteolytic enzymes that are associated with tissue damage.

In contrast to our findings, Steele and coworkers recently reported that AMCase−/− mice were more resistant to acute pulmonary aspergillosis than control mice, although AMCase−/− mice also showed less airway hyper-responsiveness compared with control mice in a model of chronic fungal asthma [40]. Those authors indicated that the increased resistance in the acute model was due to elevated production of proinflammatory cytokines that mediate fungal killing, which we did not detect in our studies.

An important difference between that study and ours is the site of infection and the critical role for neutrophils in the cornea compared with the lungs. We recently reported that neutrophil calprotectin (S100A8/A9) was required to control Aspergillus hyphae in infected corneas, but not in the lungs, as we showed that S100A9−/− mice were more susceptible to corneal, but not pulmonary Aspergillus infection [8]. In that report, we speculated that the difference was at least in part due to the large neutrophil infiltrate in acute corneal infection, whereas the lung infiltrate at the time examined also included macrophages and eosinophils. Given the current findings with corneal infection, and the nonredundant role for AMCase in the ability of neutrophils to kill A. fumigatus hyphae in vitro, it is highly likely that the difference between our studies and those of Steele et al. relates to the major role that neutrophils play in corneal compared with pulmonary disease.

The role for AMCase in pulmonary disease is somewhat controversial. Elias and coworkers, and others reported that AMCase has an important role in the pathology of asthma by inducing neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration and airway hyper-responsiveness [20, 41]. AMCase is highly expressed in OVA—sensitized mice that develop airway hyper—responsiveness and in lung tissue from asthmatic patients [22]. Moreover, chemical inhibition of AMCase ameliorated allergic inflammation by decreasing eosinophil and neutrophil recruitment to the lungs of OVA-sensitized mice [20]. In contrast, Fitz and colleagues reported that despite the absence of chitinase activity in models of pulmonary inflammation and allergic airway disease, the absence of AMCase had no significant effect on cellularity or airway responses [29]. Wynn et al. also found no role for AMCase in airway disease induced by house dust mite allergens, although AMCase was essential for developing a protective type II immune response to intestinal nematodes [42]. Locksley and coworkers showed that older mice spontaneously develop pulmonary fibrosis and die earlier than WT controls, at least in part due to failure to digest environmental chitin fragments that accumulate in the lungs [43]. These investigators concluded that AMCase production by specific lung epithelial cells is important for chitin degradation in the airways.

Most of those studies identified macrophages as the primary source of AMCase, whereas our findings identified murine and human neutrophils as a major source of this enzyme. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one other paper showing this, where AMCase production by neutrophils from patients with type-2 diabetes was elevated compared with healthy individuals [44].

In summary, the current study identified a novel role for neutrophil derived AMCase in targeting A. fumigatus cell wall chitin in a clinically relevant model of A. fumigatus corneal infection. These data also indicate that inhibiting chitin synthases or enhancing host chitinase activity are potential targets for therapeutic intervention for fungal infections.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Neutrophils were detected using NIMPR14 rat monoclonal antibody to Ly6G (Abcam ab2557), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies to AMCase were obtained from Proteintech (cat no 143631-AP). Bisdionin C and Nikkomycin Z were purchased from Sigma; Bisdionin F was purchased from EMD Millipore.

Source of mice

C57BL/6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and AMCase−/− mice were obtained from Dr. Lori Fitz through a material transfer agreement between UC Irvine and Pfizer. Mice were bred under specific pathogen-free conditions and maintained according to institutional guidelines. All animals were treated in accordance with the guidelines provided in the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research, and were approved by Case Western Reserve University and UC Irvine IACUC committees.

Isolation of murine bone marrow neutrophils

To isolate bone marrow neutrophils, mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation, and femurs and tibias were dissected. Cells were flushed out by placing the tip of a needle containing sterile PBS in one end of the bones and releasing the PBS. Cells were centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. Red blood cells (RBCs) were lysed in 5 mL of RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience), and neutrophils were isolated with a MojoSort mouse neutrophil isolation kit using negative selection (Biolegend). This approach typically yields a >95% neutrophil population.

Fungal strains

Aspergillus fumigatus strains used in this work are Af293 expressing red fluorescent protein as described [6], chitin synthase Family 1 mutants ΔChsA/B/C/G, and Family 2 mutants ΔChsE/Eb/D/F that were derived from the parent Ku80 as described [30]. Strains were grown at 37°C in either Aspergillus minimal medium [45] containing 1% glucose + 5 mM ammonium tartrate, YG (1% glucose, 0.5% yeast extract), Sabouraud (2% glucose, 1% neopep-tone) (Difco), RPMI (Sigma Aldrich) or 2% malt agar (Cristomalt). Conidia were collected from agar media after 10 days of growth at RT, using 0.05% Tween 80 solution.

Human peripheral blood neutrophils

Healthy donors between ages 18 and 65 years provided human peripheral blood in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines, and with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of University Hospitals of Cleveland. Informed consent was obtained in writing from each volunteer.

We used 3% dextran (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in PBS to separate RBCs from whole blood, and neutrophils were purified from the remaining cells by overlay on a Ficoll density gradient (GE Healthcare) following centrifugation for 25 min at 500 × g. The remaining RBCs were lysed, and neutrophils were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium. This process resulted in >95% purity.

Hyphal growth inhibition assay

Isolated conidia were prepared as a stock of 10 000 conidia/200 μL SDA and cultured in black 96-well plates with an optical clear bottom (CoStar 3720) for 6 h at 37°C to obtain germ tubes. Super-natants were removed and cells were washed ×3 with ddH2O. Cells were then incubated with RPMI alone or RPMI + human neutrophils (200 000 neutrophils/well) and incubated at 37°C for 16 h. For drug studies, neutrophils were incubated with the drug for 30 min at 37°C prior to the stimulation and then added to the plates. Next day, cells were washed ×3 with ddH2O and fungal viability was measured by incubating hyphae with the XTT dye as previously described [28].

Murine model of A. fumigatus keratitis

Male and female mice aged 6–8 weeks were infected as previously described [9, 11]. A. fumigatus strains were cultured in VMM agar in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks. Dormant conidia were recovered with a bacterial L-loop and harvested in 5 mL PBS. Pure coni-dial suspensions were obtained by passing the culture suspension through PBS-soaked sterile gauges placed at the tip of a 10 mL syringe. Conidia were quantified and a stock was made at a final concentration of 2.5 × 104 conidia/μL in PBS. Mice were anaesthetized and the corneal epithelium was abraded with a 30 gauge needle to allow insertion of a 33-gauge Hamilton needle through which 2 μL PBS containing 4 × 104 conidia were injected into the corneal stroma. Nikkomycin Z was suspended in cyclodextran, and 2 μL 10 mg/mL stock (20 ng) were injected into the corneal stroma at 6 h postinfection.

Mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and positioned in a three-point stereotactic mouse restrainer. Corneal opacity (brightfield) and corneal fungal growth (fluorescence) were photographed using a high-resolution stereo fluorescence MZFLIII microscope (Leica Micro-systems) and Spot RT Slider KE camera (Diagnostics Instruments). Images were captured using SpotCam software (RT Slider KE; Diagnostics Instruments). MetaMorph imaging software was used to quantify the percent area of opacity and the integrated corneal opacity as described by Leal et al. [23].

Adoptive transfer model of A. fumigatus keratitis

To examine a specific role for neutrophils in vivo, we used CD18−/− mice, as circulating neutrophils are unable to extravasate to inflamed tissues. Bone marrow neutrophils were isolated from C57BL/6 and AMCase−/− mice, and 4 × 106 cells were injected intravenously in 150 μL 4 h after corneal infection with Aspergillus. After 24 h, corneas were examined as described above. We reported that this experimental approach results in neutrophil recruitment to infected corneas [23].

Quantification of CFUs

For assessment of fungal viability, whole eyes were homogenized under sterile conditions in 1 mL PBS, using the Mixer Mill MM300 (Retsch, Qiagen, Valencia, CA) at 33 Hz for 4 min. Subsequently, serial log dilutions were performed and plated onto Sabouraud dextrose agar plates (Becton Dickenson). Following incubation for 24 h at 37°C, CFUs were quantified by direct counting.

Flow cytometric analysis

Infected corneas were incubated in 500 μL collagenase type I (Sigma-Aldrich) at 82 U/cornea for 1–2 h at 37°C. Cells were resuspended in 200 μL FACS buffer containing Fc block anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (clone 93, 16-0161-86; eBioscience), and then incubated with anti-mouse neutrophil antibody (Ly6G, NIMP-R14-PE, ab125259; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-CD11b-APC FAB1124A (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), CD45-FITC (30-F11), Ly6C APC-Cy7 (HK1.4), and Ep-CAM-PECy7 (G8.8). All antibodies were purchased from BioLegend. Total cells were examined in an ACEA Novocyte™ flow cytometer and analyzed as we described, and in accordance with guidelines for flow cytometry [39, 46, 47].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using either an unpaired t test or ANOVA with Tukey posttest (Prism GraphPad). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data

Acknowledgments:

The authors greatly appreciate the outstanding technical assistance of the Visual Sciences Research Center core facilities at CWRU, especially Scott Howell, Catherine Doller, and Dawn Smith. We also thank Michaela Marshall at UCI for outstanding technical support and Stuart Levitz and Charles Specht at UMASS for sending the AMCase−/− mice. This work was supported by R01 EY18612 (EP), by core grant P30 EY11373, and by the Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation.

Abbreviations:

CHS

chitin synthases

IHC

immunohistochemistry

Footnotes

Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the material presented in this study.

References

  • 1.Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO and Denning DW, Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J. Fungi 2017. 3: E57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NA, Levitz SM, Netea MG and White TC, Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med 2012. 4: 165rv113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ung L, Bispo PJ, Shanbhag SS, Gilmore MS and Chodosh J, The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance. Surv. Ophthalmol 2018. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leal SM Jr. and Pearlman E, The role of cytokines and pathogen recognition molecules in fungal keratitis—insights from human disease and animal models. Cytokine 2012. 58: 107–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Karthikeyan RS, Leal SM Jr., Prajna NV, Dharmalingam K, Geiser DM, Pearlman E and Lalitha P, Expression of innate and adaptive immune mediators in human corneal tissue infected with Aspergillus or fusarium. J. Infect. Dis 2011. 204: 942–950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leal SM Jr., Cowden S, Hsia YC, Ghannoum MA, Momany M and Pearlman E, Distinct roles for dectin-1 and TLR4 in the pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis. PLoS Pathog. 2010. 6: e1000976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tarabishy AB, Aldabagh B, Sun Y, Imamura Y, Mukherjee PK, Lass JH, Ghannoum MA et al. , MyD88 regulation of Fusarium keratitis is dependent on TLR4 and IL-1R1 but not TLR2. J. Immunol 2008. 181: 593–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clark HL, Jhingran A, Sun Y, Vareechon C, de Jesus Carrion S, Skaar EP, Chazin WJ et al. , Zinc and manganese chelation by neutrophil S100A8/A9 (Calprotectin) limits extracellular Aspergillus fumigatus hyphal growth and corneal infection. J. Immunol 2016. 196: 336–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leal SM Jr., Roy S, Vareechon C, Carrion S, Clark H, Lopez-Berges MS, Di Pietro A et al. , Targeting iron acquisition blocks infection with the fungal pathogens Aspergillus fumigatus and Fusarium oxysporum. PLoS Pathog. 2013. 9: e1003436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hood MI and Skaar EP, Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 2012. 10: 525–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carrion Sde J, Leal SM Jr., Ghannoum MA, Aimanianda V, Latge JP and Pearlman E, The RodA hydrophobin on Aspergillus fumigatus spores masks dectin-1- and dectin-2-dependent responses and enhances fungal survival in vivo. J. Immunol 2013. 191: 2581–2588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gow NAR, Latge JP and Munro CA, The fungal cell wall: structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol. Spectr 2017. 5 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0035-2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Debono M and Gordee RS, Antibiotics that inhibit fungal cell wall development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 1994. 48: 471–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee CG, Da Silva CA, Lee JY, Hartl D and Elias JA, Chitin regulation of immune responses: an old molecule with new roles. Curr. Opin. Immunol 2008. 20: 684–689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Georgopapadakou NH and Tkacz JS, The fungal cell wall as a drug target. Trends Microbiol. 1995. 3: 98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fusetti F, von Moeller H, Houston D, Rozeboom HJ, Dijkstra BW, Boot RG, Aerts JM et al. , Structure of human chitotriosidase. Implications for specific inhibitor design and function of mammalian chitinase-like lectins. J. Biol. Chem 2002. 277: 25537–25544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee CG, Da Silva CA, Dela Cruz CS, Ahangari F, Ma B, Kang MJ, He CH et al. , Role of chitin and chitinase/chitinase-like proteins in inflammation, tissue remodeling, and injury. Annu. Rev. Physiol 2011. 73: 479–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vega K and Kalkum M, Chitin, chitinase responses, and invasive fungal infections. Int. J. Microbiol 2012. 2012: 920459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bierbaum S, Nickel R, Koch A, Lau S, Deichmann KA, Wahn U, Superti-Furga A et al. , Polymorphisms and haplotypes of acid mammalian chitinase are associated with bronchial asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 2005. 172: 1505–1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Donnelly LE and Barnes PJ, Acidic mammalian chitinase—a potential target for asthma therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci 2004. 25: 509–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sutherland TE, Andersen OA, Betou M, Eggleston IM, Maizels RM, van Aalten D and Allen JE, Analyzing airway inflammation with chemical biology: dissection of acidic mammalian chitinase function with a selective drug-like inhibitor. Chem. Biol 2011. 18: 569–579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhu Z, Zheng T, Homer RJ, Kim YK, Chen NY, Cohn L, Hamid Q et al. , Acidic mammalian chitinase in asthmatic Th2 inflammation and IL-13 pathway activation. Science 2004. 304: 1678–1682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Leal SM Jr., Vareechon C, Cowden S, Cobb BA, Latge JP, Momany M and Pearlman E, Fungal antioxidant pathways promote survival against neutrophils during infection. J. Clin. Invest 2012. 122: 2482–2498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gaughran JP, Lai MH, Kirsch DR and Silverman SJ, Nikkomycin Z is a specific inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chitin synthase isozyme Chs3 in vitro and in vivo. J. Bacteriol 1994. 176: 5857–5860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Latge JP, Beauvais A and Chamilos G, The cell wall of the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus: biosynthesis, organization, immune response, and virulence. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 2017. 71: 99–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alcazar-Fuoli L, Clavaud C, Lamarre C, Aimanianda V, Seidl-Seiboth V, Mellado E and Latge JP, Functional analysis of the fungal/plant class chitinase family in Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet. Biol 2011. 48: 418–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schuttelkopf AW, Andersen OA, Rao FV, Allwood M, Rush CL, Eggleston IM and van Aalten DM, Bisdionin C-a rationally designed, submicromolar inhibitor of family 18 chitinases. ACS Med. Chem. Lett 2011. 2: 428–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shepardson KM, Ngo LY, Aimanianda V, Latge JP, Barker BM, Blosser SJ, Iwakura Y et al. , Hypoxia enhances innate immune activation to Aspergillus fumigatus through cell wall modulation. Microbes Infect. 2013. 15: 259–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fitz LJ, DeClercq C, Brooks J, Kuang W, Bates B, Demers D, Winkler A et al. , Acidic mammalian chitinase is not a critical target for allergic airway disease. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol 2012. 46: 71–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Muszkieta L, Aimanianda V, Mellado E, Gribaldo S, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Szewczyk E, Prevost MC et al. , Deciphering the role of the chitin synthase families 1 and 2 in the in vivo and in vitro growth of Aspergillus fumigatus by multiple gene targeting deletion. Cell. Microbiol 2014. 16: 1784–1805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim MK, Park HS, Kim CH, Park HM and Choi W, Inhibitory effect of nikkomycin Z on chitin synthases in Candida albicans. Yeast 2002. 19: 341–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Verwer PE, van Duijn ML, Tavakol M, Bakker-Woudenberg IA and van de Sande WW, Reshuffling of Aspergillus fumigatus cell wall components chitin and beta-glucan under the influence of caspofungin or nikkomycin Z alone or in combination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2012. 56: 1595–1598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wagener J, Malireddi RK, Lenardon MD, Koberle M, Vautier S, MacCallum DM, Biedermann T et al. , Fungal chitin dampens inflammation through IL-10 induction mediated by NOD2 and TLR9 activation. PLoS Pathog. 2014. 10: e1004050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Da Silva CA, Hartl D, Liu W, Lee CG and Elias JA, TLR-2 and IL-17A in chitin-induced macrophage activation and acute inflammation. J. Immunol 2008. 181: 4279–4286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Da Silva CA, Chalouni C, Williams A, Hartl D, Lee CG and Elias JA, Chitin is a size-dependent regulator of macrophage TNF and IL-10 production. J. Immunol 2009. 182: 3573–3582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shibata Y, Foster LA, Metzger WJ and Myrvik QN, Alveolar macrophage priming by intravenous administration of chitin particles, polymers of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, in mice. Infect. Immun 1997. 65: 1734–1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bueter CL, Lee CK, Rathinam VA, Healy GJ, Taron CH, Specht CA and Levitz SM, Chitosan but not chitin activates the inflammasome by a mechanism dependent upon phagocytosis. J. Biol. Chem 2011. 286: 35447–35455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Becker KL, Aimanianda V, Wang X, Gresnigt MS, Ammerdorffer A, Jacobs CW, Gazendam RP et al. , Aspergillus cell wall chitin induces anti- and proinflammatory cytokines in human PBMCs via the Fc-gamma receptor/Syk/PI3K pathway. MBio 2016. 7: e01823–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Clark HL, Abbondante S, Minns MS, Greenberg EN, Sun Y and Pearlman E, Protein deiminase 4 and CR3 regulate Aspergillus fumigatus and beta-glucan-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation, but hyphal killing is dependent only on CR3. Front Immunol. 2018. 9: 1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Garth JM, Mackel JJ, Reeder KM, Blackburn JP, Dunaway CW, Yu Z, Matalon S et al. , Acidic mammalian chitinase negatively affects immune responses during acute and chronic Aspergillus fumigatus exposure. Infect. Immun 2018. 86: e00944–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shuhui L, Mok YK and Wong WS, Role of mammalian chitinases in asthma. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol 2009. 149: 369–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vannella KM, Ramalingam TR, Hart KM, de Queiroz Prado R, Sciurba J, Barron L, Borthwick LA et al. , Acidic chitinase primes the protective immune response to gastrointestinal nematodes. Nat. Immunol 2016. 17: 538–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Van Dyken SJ, Liang HE, Naikawadi RP, Woodruff PG, Wolters PJ, Erle DJ and Locksley RM, Spontaneous chitin accumulation in airways and age-related fibrotic lung disease. Cell 2017. 169: 497–509, e413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zurawska-Plaksej E, Lugowska A, Hetmanczyk K, Knapik-Kordecka M and Piwowar A, Neutrophils as a source of chitinases and chitinase-like proteins in type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 2015. 10: e0141730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cove DJ, The induction and repression of nitrate reductase in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1966. 113: 51–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sun Y, Abbondante S, Karmakar M, de Jesus Carrion S, Che C, Hise AG and Pearlman E, Neutrophil caspase-11 is required for cleavage of caspase-1 and secretion of IL-1beta in Aspergillus fumigatus infection. J. Immunol 2018. 201: 2767–2775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cossarizza A, Chang HD, Radbruch A, Akdis M, Andra I, Annunziato F, Bacher P et al. , Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies. Eur. J. Immunol 2017. 47: 1584–1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data

RESOURCES