Table 3.
Risk of bias assessment.
| Study | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants and personnel | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Anything else, ideally prespecified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gainnier, 2004 | Low risk of bias computer-generated |
Low risk of bias Centralized |
High risk of bias Nurses aware of assignment |
High risk of bias Analyst aware of assignment |
Low risk of bias outcome data complete |
Low risk of bias None |
Low risk of bias None |
| Forel, 2006 | Low risk of bias computer-generated |
Low risk of bias Centralized |
High risk of bias Nurses aware of assignment |
High risk of bias Evaluators aware of assignment |
Low risk of bias outcome data complete |
Low risk of bias None |
Low risk of bias None |
| Papazian, 2010 | Low risk of bias computer-generated |
Low risk of bias Centralized |
Low risk of bias Blinding of all participants |
Low risk of bias Blinding of evaluators |
Low risk of bias outcome data complete |
Low risk of bias None |
Low risk of bias None |
| Guervilly, 2017 | Low risk of bias computer-generated |
unclear risk of bias | unclear risk of bias | unclear risk of bias | Low risk of bias outcome data complete |
Low risk of bias None |
Low risk of bias None |
| Moss, 2019 | Low risk of bias computer-generated |
Low risk of bias Centralized |
High risk of bias Participants aware of assignment |
High risk of bias Evaluators aware of assignment |
Low risk of bias outcome data complete |
Low risk of bias None |
Low risk of bias None |