Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 29;10:1637. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01637

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment.

Study Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of participants and personnel Blinding of outcome assessment Incomplete outcome data Selective reporting Anything else, ideally prespecified
Gainnier, 2004 Low risk of bias
computer-generated
Low risk of bias
Centralized
High risk of bias
Nurses aware of assignment
High risk of bias
Analyst aware of assignment
Low risk of bias
outcome data complete
Low risk of bias
None
Low risk of bias
None
Forel, 2006 Low risk of bias
computer-generated
Low risk of bias
Centralized
High risk of bias
Nurses aware of assignment
High risk of bias
Evaluators aware of assignment
Low risk of bias
outcome data complete
Low risk of bias
None
Low risk of bias
None
Papazian, 2010 Low risk of bias
computer-generated
Low risk of bias
Centralized
Low risk of bias
Blinding of all participants
Low risk of bias
Blinding of evaluators
Low risk of bias
outcome data complete
Low risk of bias
None
Low risk of bias
None
Guervilly, 2017 Low risk of bias
computer-generated
unclear risk of bias unclear risk of bias unclear risk of bias Low risk of bias
outcome data complete
Low risk of bias
None
Low risk of bias
None
Moss, 2019 Low risk of bias
computer-generated
Low risk of bias
Centralized
High risk of bias
Participants aware of assignment
High risk of bias
Evaluators aware of assignment
Low risk of bias
outcome data complete
Low risk of bias
None
Low risk of bias
None