Table 1.
Type of study, level of evidence, modified Coleman methodology score, potential high risk of bias, and conflicts of interest amongst authors.
Authors | Type of study | Level of evidence | Modified Coleman score | Possible high risk of bias | Conflict of interest |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ozgur et al.24 | retrospective | IV | 44 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |
Lanzone et al.25 | prospective | IV | 60 | Selection, detection and performance | no |
Lorenzetti et al.26 | retrospective | IV | 50 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |
Garofalo et al.27 | retrospective | IV | 52 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |
Jones et al. 28 |
retrospective | IV | 44 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |
Werner et al. 5 |
prospective | IV | 52 | Selection, detection and performance | no |
Ernstbrunner et al.29 | prospective | IV | 52 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |
Lopiz et al.30 | retrospective | IV | 46 | Selection, detection and performance | no |
Boileau et al. 13 |
retrospective | IV | 50 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |
Tashjian et al.31 | retrospective | IV | 47 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |
Gupta et al.32 | retrospective | IV | 40 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |
Mahylis et al.33 | retrospective | III | 37 | Selection, detection and performance | no |
Wagner et al.6 | prospective | III | 48 | Selection, detection and performance | yes |