Table 3.
Findings of studies looking at the function of the MPFL.
Study | Knee Positions | Quadriceps Tension | MPFL Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Conlan et al.19 | Full extension | No | MPFL provides 53% of medial restraint Restraining force with all structures intact was 225 N/cm |
Hautmaa et al.25 | Tests performed with knee at 30° (±5°) | Yes - 2-pound weight applied as resting physiological load | MPFL responsible for 50% of medial restraint with a displacement of 13.8 mm with 5lb of force applied |
Farahmand et al.22 | Patellar displacement (10 mm) was measured at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60 and 90° | Yes – varying forces used | Decrease in force required to displace patella between 0° and 20° which then remains reasonably constant until 60° |
Zaffagnini et al.12 | Testing performed at 0, 30, 60 and 90° of flexion | Yes - 60 N isolated force through the quadriceps tendon | With a resected MPFL, there is increased laxity at 30–60° of knee flexion |
Desio et al.20 | Testing performed at 20° of flexion | Yes – 2lb weight attached to centralise patella | MPFL represents 60% of restraint Average force of 182 N required to achieve maximal patella translation |
Senvongse et al.21 | Testing performed from 0 to 90° | Yes – 175 N | 75 N of force required to displace patella at 20° of knee flexion compared with 126 N and 125 N at 0° and 90° respectively |
Mountney et al.24 | Knee placed in external rotation | No | Mean tensile strength of 208 N required for MPFL to rupture |
Burks et al.23 | Secured in 20° of flexion | Yes – 2lb weight attached to centralise patella | Mean tensile strength of 209 N required for MPFL to rupture |