TABLE 5.

Stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) methodology.

	XRD	NITA	METD	MAN	EBITTA	STA	WCTA	RETA	TLTA
Sum of ranks	17.00	27.00	33.00	68.00	79.00	66.00	105.00	86.00	63.00
Avg. attribute rank value	1.42	2.25	2.75	5.70	6.60	5.50	8.30	7.17	5.25
Attribute rank	9	8	7	4	3	5	1	2	6
Attribute weight	0.03	0.05	0.06	0.13	0.15	0.12	0.19	0.16	0.12
Dispersion	0.45	1.11	1.48	2.42	2.81	2.64	0.79	3.24	1.30
Variation	0.47	0.47	0.44	0.27	0.25	0.30	0.11	0.25	0.22
Ranking sum average V	60	=45*12/9
Total square ranging deviator	1,849	1,089	729	64	361	36	2,025	676	9
Coefficient (W)	0.79	=12*6,838/[12^2*(9^3–9)]
Significance of the concordance coefficient	75.98	=12*6,838/(12*9*10)
Rank of table concordance	The null hypothesis H0: The consent of experts in rankings is not accepted. Degrees of freedom (df) are v = 9 - 1 = 8, which is # of categories minus 1. The indication is 75.97 > 15.5 at α = 5%
Compatibility of expert judgment	Hence, we can reject the null hypothesis H0.