Table 3.
Extracted data regarding duration of stimulation and cycle cancelation rate for FPS and LPS respectively
| Studies | Stimulation days | Cycle cancelation rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPS | LPS | FPS | LPS | |
| Kuang et al. 2014 [6] | 10.2 ± 2.4 | 10.8 ± 3.1 | 20/38 (52.6%) | 13/30 (43.3%) |
| Ubaldi et al. 2016 [9] | 9.6 ± 2.4 | 10.3 ± 2.5 | 4/43 (9.3%) | 3/43 (6.9%) |
| Liu et al. 2017 [20] | 8.3 ± 3.5 | 7.5 ± 3.4 | 43/116 (37.1%) | 33/116 (28.4%) |
| Zhang et al. 2017 [21] | 3.9 ± 3.2 | 8.7 ± 3.5 | 19/153 (12.4%) | 5/153 (3.3%) |
| Rashtian et al. 2017 [7] | 8.3 ± 0.6 | 7.9 ± 0.5 | ΝΑ | ΝΑ |
| Jin et al. 2018 [19] | 7.5 ± 2.4 | 8.3 ± 4.0 | 25/72 (34.7%) | 21/76 (27.6%) |
| Vaiarelli et al. 2018 [10] | NA | NA | 17/353 (4.8%) | 26/336 (7.7%) |
| Zhang et al. 2018 [22] | 6.9 ± 4.1 | 7.9 ± 4.0 | NA | NA |
| Madani et al. 2019 [16] | 8.0 ± 2.6 | 7.8 ± 2.8 | 12/121 (9.9%) | 23/104 (22.1%) |
FPS follicular phase stimulation, LPS luteal phase stimulation, NA not applicable