Table 2.
Group comparisons of the baseline cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area.
| Group | N | CSA in mm2 | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALS | 158 | 61 [7] | F(1,240) = 10.7, p = 0.001 |
| Controls | 86 | 64 [7] | |
| Limb-onset ALS | 110 | 60 [7] | F(1,153) = 5.4, p = 0.02 |
| Bulbar-onset ALS | 45 | 62 [6] | |
| Classic ALS | 108 | 61 [7] | F(3,154) < 1.7, p > 0.2 |
| LMND ALS | 27 | 59 [6] | |
| UMND ALS | 14 | 62 [7] | |
| PLS | 9 | 56 [7] | |
| Sporadic ALS | 49 | 61 [7] | F(1,61) = 1, p = 0.4 |
| Familial ALS | 14 | 63 [8] | |
| No NIV | 122 | 61 [7] | F(1,136) = 0.9, p = 0.4 |
| NIV | 16 | 61 [6] |
Mean [SD] of the baseline cervical spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is given. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; LMND, lower motor neuron dominant; N, number; NIV, non-invasive ventilation; PLS, primary lateral sclerosis; UMND, upper motor neuron dominant. P-values ≤ 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. Statistical models are adjusted for baseline age.