Table 2.
Comparison of the simulated with the measured peak visibility of the nGI-setup.
| DC0 | G1 | Wavelength range | h1(μm) | Total exposure (s) | λ(Å) | Measurement | Simulation | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak visibility | Peak visibility | ||||||
| 0.4 | π | 3.0 Å–5.75 Å | 43 | 1280 | 3.9 | 0.21 | – | 
| 0.18 | π | 3.5 Å–4.5 Å | 41 | 240 | 4.0 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 
| 0.28 | π | 1.6 Å–6.0 Å | 41 | 480 | 4.0 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 
| 0.38 | π | 3.5 Å–4.5 Å | 41 | 240 | 4.0 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 
| 0.48 | π | 3.5 Å–4.5 Å | 41 | 240 | 4.0 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 
| 0.28 | 3π | 1.6 Å–6.0 Å | 123 | 480 | 3.75 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 
For the simulations (see Sec. 2.1) the effective parameters listed in Table 1 have been used. The measured visibility of the new setup is significantly larger than the visibility of the previous setup (first row) and approaches the theoretical optimum.