Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 26;8(2):294–305. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i2.294

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of bariatric patients with magnetic sphincter augmentation devices

Ref. Study period No. of patients (follow-up) Type of surgery BMI on bariatric surgery (kg/m2, mean) BMI loss between bariatric surgery and MSA (kg/m2, range) BMI on MSA implan-tation (kg/m2, mean) Mean period between surgery and MSA (mo) Pre-operative GERD-HRQL score Post-operative GERD-HRQL score Compli-cations/ satis-faction
Desart et al[44], 2015 2014-2015 7 (7) 7 LSG 50.7 9.4-25.5 NA 18.1 17-18 5-6 NA/All patients satisfied
Hawasli et al[45], 2018 2015-2017 13 (13) 13 LSG 46 NA 33 (21-44 range) 43 47 (mean) 12 (mean) 1 Severe dysphagia-device removal/NA
Broderick et al[46], 2019 2014-2018 13 (6 with GERD-HRQL score) 8 LSG 4 LRYGB 1 DS NA NA 30.1 NA 15-45 5-13 2 endoscopic dilations/All patients satisfied
Cumu-lative Data 2014-2018 33 (26) 34 LSG 4 LRYGB 1 DS Not enough information to compile cumulative data

LSG: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; LRYGB: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; DS: Duodenal switch; MSA: Magnetic sphincter augmentation; N.A.: Not available.