Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 8;2010(12):CD002893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002893.pub2

Dahl 2006b.

Methods Randomised DBPC trial; multicentre
Participants Adults
316 active (179 m); losses to f/u 42 
 318 placebo (193 m); losses to f/u 46
Interventions 12 months SLIT 
 Sublingual tablet 
 Grass pollen 
 75 000 SQ‐T 
 Phl p 5 15 mcg 
 Daily
Outcomes Rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score 
 Medication score 
 Global assessment 
 Adverse events
Notes Jadad scale 5/5
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk The allocation sequence was generated by the sponsoring company and blinded for the investigators
Allocation concealment? Low risk Central allocation
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Low risk Unblinded efficacy and safety assessments on subject level were available only for a biostatistician at the Contract Research Organization. All personnel associated with the study and participants remained blinded.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome data were completed for each main outcome. Attrition and exclusions were reported. The numbers in each intervention group and reasons for attrition/exclusions were reported.
Free of selective reporting? Low risk The specified outcomes in the methodology were reported in the results section
Free of other bias? Low risk No other sources of bias were detected or suspected