Centralized |
Easy to monitor and maintain.
Investment cost is low as only one inverter, i.e., central inverter is used.
|
High DC losses in HVDC cables.
Power losses due to centralized MPPT, string diodes, and PV module mismatch.
Less reliable.
Inflexibility in design.
|
Several megawatts |
Master–slave |
Higher reliability compared to centralized topology.
Improved efficiency for the operating inverters.
Increased life of inverters.
|
DC losses in HVDC cables.
Power losses due to centralized MPPT, string diodes, and PV module mismatch.
Less reliable.
Cost increased due to multiple inverters.
Inflexibility in design.
|
Several megawatts |
String |
|
|
3–5 kW per string |
Team concept |
|
|
Several megawatts |
Multistring |
Reduced energy losses from partial shading.
No losses in string diodes.
Control of MPPT and current withdrawn is separated.
The boost converter is implied for voltage amplification.
|
Reliability of the system decreases due to the connection of all the strings to a single inverter.
Losses are due to boost converter.
Higher cost compared to centralized topology.
|
5 KW |
AC modules |
There are no losses due to partial shading and mismatch between modules.
Easier in failure detection and maintenance.
Flexibility in design and easy to expand.
|
|
Less than 500 W |