1 |
Problem identification discussion focusing on needs/practice/policy analyses. |
The unique needs and challenges of the population as well as the practice and policy issues were discussed. |
2 |
Discussion and determination of the intervention target population. |
Participants with multiple chronic conditions returning to the community from an institution were selected as the target population. |
3 |
Discussion of the intervention and drafting of the overall objectives. |
Two primary aims, one focused on cost effectiveness and one focused on project effectiveness, were agreed upon by the design team. |
4 |
Adoption of finalized objectives and selection of the guiding theory. |
The Chronic Care Model was selected to inform evaluation of the intervention. |
5 |
Presentation of six possible types of telehealth interventions to the design team. |
Based on current scientific evidence, discussions from the group, and a review of Medicaid claims data, a recommendation of a combo of 3 interventions was made. |
5&6 |
Build intervention and protocol development. |
Remote monitoring for Chronic Conditions, Remote Nursing Assessment, & Care Coordination telehealth types selected. |
7–9 |
Four potential vendors selected for presentation invitations and final vendor selection. |
Each vendor presented available services which were evaluated by the group and a combination of 2 vendors was chosen. |
10 |
Expert review with all stakeholders. |
Revisions were made based on feedback. |