Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan-Apr;14(1):34–44. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1413

Table 1.

The results of included studies stating study type, patient sample size, and level of evidence

No Ref. Title Type of study Patient sample Level of evidence
  1 Barker et al. 200434 Functional recovery in patients with nonunion treated with the Ilizarov technique Prospective case series 40 patients Level 4
32 men, 8 women
  2 Brinker and O'Connor 200735 Outcomes of tibial nonunion in older adults following treatment using the Ilizarov method Prospective case series 23 patients Level 4
6 lost to follow-up aged 61–92
  3 Foster et al. 201232 The treatment of complex tibial shaft fractures by the Ilizarov method Retrospective study 40 patients Level 4
Ages 19–81 (mean 43)
28 men, 12 women
  4 Ghoneem et al. 199636 The Ilizarov method for correction of complex deformities Retrospective review 45 patients Level 4
26 boys, 19 girls
Aged 3–18 (mean 12)
  5 Gunes et al. 200837 Quality of life in patients with varus gonarthrosis treated with high tibial osteotomy using the circular external fixator Retrospective case series 27 patients Level 4
Aged 45–65
18 females, 9 male
  6 Horn et al. 201138 Supramalleolar osteotomy using circular external fixation with six-axis eformity correction of the distal tibia Retrospective review 52 patients Level 4
Aged 18–79 (mean 44)
23 men, 29 women
  7 Robinson et al. 201139 High tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthris and varus deformity using the Taylor spatial frame: early results Prospective case series 9 patients Level 4
Aged 37–59 (mean 49)
All men
  8 Kim et al. 20124 Is bilateral lower limb lengthening appropriate for achondroplasia? midterm analysis of the complications and quality of life Retrospective case control 22 patients Level 4
Aged 8–25
  9 McKee et al. 199840 Health status after Ilizarov reconstruction of post-traumatic lower-limb deformity Prospective case series 22 patients Level 4
Aged 18–72
12 men, 10 women
10 Mekhail et al. 2004 41 Bone transport in the management of posttraumatic bone defects in the lower extremity Retrospective study 19 patients Level 4
Mean age 36.4
14 men, 5 women
11 Modin et al. 20096 Postoperative impact of daily life after primary treatment of proximal/distal tibiafracture with Ilizarov external fixation Prospective descriptive research design 20 patients Level 4
Aged 34–76
12 Ramos et al. 201342 The Ilizarov external fixator—a useful alternative for the treatment of proximal tibial fractures a prospective observational study of 30 consecutive patients Prospective observational study 30 patients Level 4
Aged 18–74 (mean 51)
18 men, 12 women
13 Rozbruch et al. 200843 Repair of tibial nonunions and bone defects with the taylor spatial frame Prospective case series 38 patients Level 4
Aged 8–72 (mean 43)
30 men, 8 women
14 Spiegl et al. 201344 Clinical course, complication rate and outcome of segmental resection and distraction osteogenesis after chronic tibial osteitis Prospective case series 25 patients Level 4
Aged 20–60 (mean 46)
22 men, 3 women
15 Tellisi et al. 200945 Joint preservation of the osteoarthritic ankle using distraction arthroplasty Prospective case series 25 patients Level 4
Aged 16–73 (mean 43)
16 females, 7 males