. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 5.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Men Masc. 2019 Mar 14;21(1):58–68. doi: 10.1037/men0000209

Table 4.

Dataset One: Multiple regression analyses predicting S3 traditional masculinity ideologies (socialization effects; ns = 163 to 165)

	Male role norms: Status		Male role norms: Toughness		Male role norms: Antifemininity		Masculine traits		Sexual double standard

	Step 1	Step 2	Step 1	Step 2	Step 1	Step 2	Step 1	Step 2	Step 1	Step 2

	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β
Age	−.04	−.04	.03	.03	−.01	−.01	.09⁺	.09⁺	−.02	−.02
Black/African American	.06	.07	.03	.04	.04	.04	.09	.09	.10	.10
Latino/Hispanic American	−.02	−.01	−.02	−.01	−.03	−.02	−.03	−.01	.07	.08
S1 Indicator of masculinity ideologies	.73^***	.71^***	.67^***	.67^***	.73^***	.73^***	.73^***	.72^***	.61^***	.60^***
Fraternity membership by S2		.08		.03		.01		.06		.07
R²	.55^***	.56^***	.46^***	.46^***	.53^***	.53^***	.56^***	.56^***	.37^***	.37^***
Δ R² from Step 1 to Step 2		.01		.00		.00		.00		.00

Note.

⁺

p < .10

^***

p < .001.