Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 1;94(15):1369–1377. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01876

A two-way sensitivity analysis evaluating the cost of double-row repair (a baseline of $11,914) and the probability of symptoms following double-row repair (a baseline of 0.20) for tears of <3 cm (Fig. 3-A) and tears of ≥3 cm (Fig. 3-B). The red shaded area indicates where a single-row repair (SR) would be the favored strategy, while the blue shaded region indicates that double-row repair (DR) becomes cost-effective. As the percentage of patients with symptoms from a retear increases, more could be spent on the second row.

Fig. 3-A.

Fig. 3-A

Fig. 3-B.

Fig. 3-B