Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 7;9(2):e963. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.963

Table A1.

Relative abundances of the taxa identified by LEfSe that significantly differed in abundance between ventral epithelium fractions of yak and cattle rumen [Correction added on 6 January 2020 after first online publication: Table A1 from Supporting Information has been moved to Appendix section]

Fraction Taxa Relative abundance (Mean ± SD)
Yak Cattle
Yak Blvii28 wastewater‐sludge 5.50±4.82 0.01±0.01
RuminococcaceaeUCG005 3.85±2.50 0.17±0.04
Campylobacter 4.95±2.40 0.87±0.21
Prevotellaceae UCG 001 5.58±1.63 3.21±0.28
RuminococcaceaeUCG010 1.06±0.37 0.48±0.08
ErysipelotrichaceaeUCG004 0.76±0.24 0.18±0.07
Anaeroplasma 0.72±0.54 0.16±0.08
Eubacterium coprostanoligenes 0.75±0.10 0.32±0.15
Cattle CAG‐352 0.0±0.0 0.21±0.23
Ruminococcus gauvreauii 0.09±0.02 0.32±0.26
Ruminococcaceae UCG 004 0.04±0.02 0.28±0.14
Lachnospiraceae ND3007 0.10±0.06 0.39±0.23
Moryella 0.01±0.01 0.29±0.14
Flexilinea 0.05±0.02 0.38±0.07
Defluviitaleaceae UCG 011 0.07±0.05 0.42±0.20
Succinivibrionaceae UCG 002 0.01±0.01 0.63±0.76
Ruminococcus 2 0.03±0.03 0.73±0.42
Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 0.60±0.32 1.86±0.71
Comamonas 0.31±0.35 1.96±1.14
Succiniclasticum 0.41±0.17 2.46±0.72
Suttonella 0.08±0.11 6.15±6.24