Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cochlear Implants Int. 2019 Oct 7;21(2):83–91. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1670486

Table 4.

Correlations between HEAR-QL and spoken language outcomes for CI participants.

HEAR-QL
HEAR-QL Pearson r 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 104
PPVT SS Pearson r 0.056
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.575
N 104
CELF SS Pearson r 0.167
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.090
N 104
LNT in Noise Pearson r .241*
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.014
N 104
Talker Discrim Pearson r 0.143
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.147
N 104
Emotion ID Pearson r .248*
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.011
N 104

HEAR-QL; Hearing Environments and Reflections on Quality of Life, PPVT;

Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, CELF; Clinical Evaluation of Functional Language,

LNT; Lexical Neighborhood Test, Discrim; Discrimination,

ID; Identification, Sig.; Significance,

N; Total Number of Particpants,

*.

Significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).