Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2020 Jan 14;92(3):2519–2526. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04086

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Overview of the quality of sequencing libraries prepared using the microfluidic system compared to manually prepared samples (10 pg) and ENCODE data (prepared using > 1 ng ChIP DNA). The ChIP DNA was on H3K4me3. (a) Pearson correlation matrix of various samples. Signals in the promoter regions (±2 kb around TSSs) were used for computation of Pearson correlation coefficients. (b) Summary of library preparation sequencing metrics. (c) Genome browser tracks comparing various datasets with libraries prepared by the microfluidic system and manually and those published by ENCODE consortium.