Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;10:30. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00030

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of the prognostic value of NLR.

Survival analysis No. of studies I2 (%) HR (95% CI) P
OS
Total 10 65% 2.08 (1.60–2.69) P < 0.00001
Treatment
Surgery 6* 14% 1.97 (1.56–2.48) P < 0.00001
Mixed 5 82% 1.98 (1.27–3.08) P = 0.002
Stage
Non-metastatic 3 33% 1.77 (1.34–2.33) P < 0.0001
Metastatic 2 0% 2.06 (1.45–2.92) P < 0.0001
Mixed 6 80% 2.33 (1.45–3.75) P = 0.0005
Ethnicity
Asian 5 59% 1.72 (1.29–2.31) P = 0.0003
Latinos 2 0% 2.34 (1.84–2.98) P < 0.00001
Caucasian 3 0% 2.60 (1.66–4.06) P < 0.0001
DSS
Total 5 0% 1.46 (1.21–1.77) P < 0.0001
Treatment
Surgery 4 0% 1.38 (1.11–1.71) P = 0.004
Mixed 1 NA 1.80 (1.20–2.70) P = 0.004
Stage
Non-metastatic 3 0% 1.78 (1.29–2.46) P = 0.0005
Mixed 2 45% 1.32 (1.04–1.67) P = 0.02
Ethnicity
Asian 2 0% 1.26 (1.00–1.60) P = 0.05
Caucasian 3 0% 1.92 (1.39–2.66) P < 0.0001
DFS
Total 6 0% 1.72 (1.43–2.08) P < 0.00001
Treatment
Surgery 4 0% 1.76 (1.42–2.18) P < 0.00001
Mixed 2 7% 1.62 (1.11–2.36) P = 0.01
Stage
Non-metastatic 3 0% 1.71 (1.37–2.13) P < 0.00001
Metastatic 1 NA 1.53 (1.03–2.26) P = 0.03
Mixed 2 0% 3.22 (1.43–7.27) P = 0.005
Ethnicity
Asian 4 0% 1.67 (1.37–2.04) P < 0.00001
Caucasian 2 0% 2.14 (1.25–3.65) P = 0.005

NA, not available.

*

Chan 2018's study has both surgery cohort and mixed treatment cohort.

Chan 2018's study has both metastatic group and non-metastatic group.