Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 5;33(12):1904–1910. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0512-1

Table 1.

Demographics stratified by the measurement method for distance between tumour margin and tantalum ring (DTR)

DTR measurement method
Group 1 Group 2
Group 2A Group 2B
Feature Transillumination only [n = 22 patients] Ultrasound only [n = 11 patients] Transillumination and ultrasound [n = 21 patients] p-valuea Total [n = 54 patients]
Age mean, years [median, range] 68 [67, 44–86] 60 [65, 27–76] 62 [63, 23–81] 0.2 64 [66, 23–86]
Sex, no. (%) 0.5b
Male 9 (41) 6 (55) 12 (57) 27 (50)
Female 13 (59) 5 (45) 9 (43) 27 (50)
Laterality, no. (%) 0.3b
Right 16 (73) 5 (45) 14 (67) 35 (65)
Left 6 (27) 6 (55) 7 (33) 19 (35)
Tumour size
Mean base, mm [median, range] 10.8 [10.5, 4.8–16.2] 8.9 [9.1, 4.1–13.7] 11.5 [11.1, 5.5–21.1] 0.1 10.7 [10.4, 4.1–21.1]
Mean thickness, mm [median, range] 3.9 [2.9, 1.7–13.1] 2.9 [2.3, 1.9–8.7] 4.8 [3.2, 1.7–14.3] 0.2 4.0 [2.8, 1.7–14.3]
Tumour epicentre location 0.054c
Macula 3 (14) 6 (55) 2 (10) 11 (21)
Macula to equator 7 (31) 4 (36) 11 (52) 22 (41)
Equator to ora serrata 9 (41) 1 (9) 7 (33) 17 (31)
Ciliary body 3 (14) 0 1 (5) 4 (7)
Tumour pigment, % [median, range] 67 [70, 5–100] 67 [80, 5–100] 65 [70, 15–100] 0.9 66 [70, 5–100]

DTR distance between tumour margin and tantalum ring

aIndependent t-test

bChi-squared test

cFisher exact test