Table 3.
Follow-up, local treatment failure and 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates based on the method of distance between tumour margin and tantalum ring (DTR) measurement
| Feature | Group 1 | Group 2 | p-valuea | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [n = 22 patients] | [n = 32 patients] | [n = 54 patients] | ||
| Mean follow-up, months [median, range] | 80 [86, 6–134] | 50 [49, 12–123] | 0.002 | 62 [60, 6–134] |
| Local treatment failure (%) | 4 (18) | 0 (0) | 0.02b | 4 (7) |
| Interval to local treatment failure, months [median, range] | 12 [10, 5–23] | na | na | 12 [10, 5–23] |
| 5-year KM estimate for: | ||||
| Local treatment success | 0.82 | 1 | 0.02c | 0.92 |
| Overall survival | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.8c | 0.84 |
na not applicable, KM Kaplan–Meier, DTR distance between tumour margin and tantalum ring
aIndependent t-test
bFisher exact test
cLog-rank test