Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 2;34(2):290–298. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0712-8

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies that evaluated the association between vision impairment and social participation.

Study author [Ref.] Study design Study site VI measure Study outcomes Sampling strategy and sample frame Sample size Mean age Control group Conclusions and measure(s) of association Bias assessment
Alma et al. [29] Cross-Sectional Netherlands VA, VF, subj. SP, ADLs Convenience; adults ≥55 seeking vision services 173 72.3 No Those with VI were restricted in socializing, but not in interpersonal relationships. Weak
Alma et al. [30] Cross-Sectional Netherlands VA, VF SP, ADLs, mental health Convenience; adults ≥55 seeking vision services 173 72.3 No VI leads to SP restriction; severity of VI has no effect. Weak
Bachar et al. [31] Cross-Sectional Jerusalem VA, VF SP Convenience; adults 45–65 seeking vision services 150 NR Yes Blind subjects showed less social engagement. Weak
Cimarolli et al. [32] Cross-Sectional New York, United States VA, CS, subj. SP, ADLs, social support Convenience; adults ≥65 seeking vision services 364 82.79 No Worse visual function was associated with less social engagement. Weak
Crews et al. [33] Cross-Sectional United States Subj. SP, ADLs Stratified random; national survey of adults ≥70 9447 NR Yes Seven out of eight social activities were sig. reduced in those with VI (ORs ranged from 0.6 to 0.9). Weak
Desrosiers et al. [34] Cross-Sectional Quebec, Canada VA, VF SP, ADLs Convenience; adults ≥65 seeking vision services 132 79.3 Yes Social roles of participants with VI were sig. reduced. Weak
Gallagher et al. [35] Cross-Sectional Ireland Subj. SP, ADLs Convenience; national survey of disabled adults 16–65 1304 42.89 Yes The greatest difficulty for those with blindness was participation in society. Weak
Jaarsma et al. [36] Cross-Sectional Netherlands VA, subj. Sports participation Convenience; adults ≥18 seeking vision services 643 49.1 No VI was negatively associated with participation in sports, but level of VI had no significant influence. Weak
Jones et al. [16] Cross-Sectional United States Subj. SP, ADLs, mental health, physical health Stratified random; national survey of adults ≥65 40695 NR Yes

Reduced SP in blind people compared with those with no VI

AOR = 2.85 (2.04, 3.97).

Moderate
Lamoureux et al. [9] Cross-Sectional Australia VA, VF SP, ADLs, mental health, physical health, other social Convenience; adults ≥18 seeking vision services 319 78.4 No Distance VA was a significant predictor of SP. Moderate
Lamoureux et al. [37] Cross-Sectional Australia VA SP, ADLs, mental health, physical health, other social Convenience; adults ≥18 seeking vision services 45 67.5 No Participants with severe VA (VA < 20/200) experience greater restriction of participation. Moderate
Latorre-Arteaga et al. [38] Cross-Sectional Spain Subj. SP, mental health Stratified random; national survey of Roma adults ≥16 22174 NR Yes SP in the Roma population is significantly associated with vision. Weak
Matthews et al. [39] Cohort (longitudinal) England Subj. SP, mental health Stratified random; national survey of adults ≥50 8581 66.46 Yes Changes in social engagement are affected to a greater magnitude by deterioration of self-reported vision. Weak
Mick et al. [40] Cross-Sectional Canada Subj. SP, other social Stratified random; national survey of adults 45–85 21241 NR Yes Vision loss was associated with reduced SP. OR 1.20 (1.04–1.39). Weak
Naël et al. [41] Cross-Sectional France VA SP, ADLs Stratified random; regional survey of adults ≥65 709 84.3 Yes Participants with severe VI (>20/63–20/40) were more likely to be restricted (RR = 2.08; 95% CI:1.25–3.47). Weak
Pongsachareonnont et al. [42] Cross-Sectional Thailand VA SP Convenience; rural community-dwelling adults ≥50 327 67.6 Yes VI was significantly associated with low social engagement (adjusted OR 4.13, CI 1.47–11.59). Weak
Viljanen et al. [43] Cross-Sectional Europe Subj. SP Stratified random; multi-national survey of adults ≥50 27536 65.2 Yes Participants who reported VI had an OR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.56–2.00) for being socially inactive. Moderate
Yang [44] Cross-Sectional Toronto, Canada VA, VF, subj. SP, mental health Convenience; adults ≥50 seeking vision care 118 NR No Those with greater glaucoma severity had more difficulty with social roles (p < 0.01). Weak
Zimdars et al. [18] Cross-Sectional England Subj. SP, ADLs, mental health, physical health, other social Stratified random; national survey of adults ≥50 11392 NR Yes

The following associations with VI were reported (ORs):

not voting:

1.5 (1.1–1.9).

no volunteering:

2.5 (1.8–3.3).

no cultured activities: 3.1 (2.5–3.8).

no hobbies:

2.5 (1.9–3.2).

Weak

ADLs activities of daily living, AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, CS contrast sensitivity, OR odds ratio, RR relative risk, SP social participation, Subj subjective, VA visual acuity, VF visual field, VI vision impairment, NR not reported