Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;4:8. doi: 10.1186/s41747-019-0141-2

Table 2.

Diagnostic accuracy for significant features differentiating patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR patients

p value* ROC-AUC Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy Cutoff
Textural features Δ Entropy 0.024 0.71 0.67 0.73 0.56 0.81 0.71 3.78
Δ LRE 0.021 0.71 0.73 0.70 0.55 0.84 0.71 0.57
Δ Busyness 0.020 0.72 0.67 0.80 0.63 0.83 0.76 34.38
Dynamic features Δ MSD 0.013 0.74 0.67 0.83 0.67 0.83 0.78 27.74
Δ WIS < 0.001 0.73 0.60 0.87 0.69 0.81 0.78 73.62
Δ WOS 0.012 0.86 0.87 0.80 0.68 0.92 0.82 24.42
SIS < 0.001 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.78 0.96 0.89 56.47

LRE Long-run emphasis, MSD Maximum signal difference, NPV Negative predictive value, PPV Positive predictive value, ROC-AUC Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, SIS Standardised index of shape, WIS Washin, WOS Washout slope

*Kruskal-Wallis test