Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;21:73. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3104-0

Table 3.

Regression analysis of the relationship between the postoperative paraspinal muscle volume loss and age

Age vs MRI (n = 24) p-value CT (n = 16) p-value
β coefficient Adjusted R2 β coefficient Adjusted R2
Changes of MF (cm3)
 Right −0.592 0.321 0.002a −0.076 − 0.065 0.780
 Left − 0.489 0.204 0.015a 0.114 −0.057 0.674
Changes of ES (cm3)
 Right 0.203 −0.002 0.342 −0.590 0.301 0.016a
 Left 0.267 0.029 0.207 −0.281 0.013 0.292
Changes of Psoas (cm3)
 Right 0.184 −0.010 0.388 0.019 −0.071 0.945
 Left 0.155 −0.020 0.469 0.189 −0.033 0.482

MRI magnetic resonance imaging, CT computed tomography, SD standard deviation, MF multifidus, ES erector spinae

aStatistically significant difference was defined as p < 0.05