Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;20:44. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1452-0

Table 6.

Evidence profile of quality of life of institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly for LEIPAD questionnaire

Certainty assessment Summary of findings
№ of participants (studies) Follow-up Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Overall certainty of evidence Study event rates (%) Anticipated absolute effects
With NIE With IE Risk with NIE Risk difference with IE
LEIPAD – Overall
 1765 (2 observational studies) very serious a very serious b,c not serious not serious

very strong association

all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed

⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 1009 756 SMD 0.11 higher (0.1 lower to 0.32 higher)
LEIPAD - Physical functions
 280 (2 observational studies) very serious a not serious not serious serious d

very strong association

all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed

⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 161 119 SMD 0.14 higher (0.1 lower to 0.38 higher)
LEIPAD - Self-care skills
 280 (2 observational studies) very serious a very serious b,c not serious very serious d, e

very strong association

all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed

⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 161 119 SMD 0.15 higher (0.47 lower to 0.77 higher)
LEIPAD - Cognitive functions
 280 (2 observational studies) very serious a not serious not serious serious d

strong association

all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed

⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 161 119

SMD 0.26

lower (0.5 lower to 0.02 lower)

LEIPAD - Depression and anxiety
 280 (2 observational studies) very serious a not serious not serious serious d

strong association

all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed

⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 161 119

SMD 0.24

lower (0.48 lower to 0)

LEIPAD - Social functions
 280 (2 observational studies) very serious a not serious not serious serious d

strong association

all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed

⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 161 119 SMD 0.35 SD higher (0.11 higher to 0.59 higher)
LEIPAD - Sexual functions
 280 (2 observational studies) very serious a not serious not serious serious d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 161 119 SMD 0.78 higher (0.5 higher to 1.06 higher)
LEIPAD - Life Satisfaction
 85 (2 observational studies) very serious a not serious not serious serious d

very strong association

all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed

⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 43 42 SMD 0.06 higher (0.37 lower to 0.48 higher)

Notes: SMD Standard mean difference; a Only studies with some risk of bias were included in this analysis; b Considerable heterogeneity; c There is wide variation in the effect estimates across studies with little or no overlap of confidence intervals associated with the effect estimates; d Total number of participants is less than 400; e Upper and lower confidence limit crosses the effect size were greater than 0.5