Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;20:44. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1452-0

Table 7.

Evidence profile of quality of life of institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly for WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire

Certainty assessment Summary of findings
№ of participants
(studies)
Follow-up
Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Overall certainty of evidence Study event rates (%) Anticipated absolute effects
With NIE With IE Risk with NIE Risk difference
with IE
WHOQOL-BREF – Overall
 5044 (5 observational studies) not serious serious a not serious not serious all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁⨁◯◯LOW 3157 1887 SMD 0.69 lower(0.93 lower to 0.46 lower)
WHOQOL-BREF - General Health
 564 (3 observational studies) very serious b very serious a,c not serious serious d strong associationall plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 425 139 SMD 0.24 lower(1.0 lower to 0.52 higher)
WHOQOL-BREF - Physical Health
 1120 (5 observational studies) not serious very serious a,c not serious not serious all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 683 437 SMD 0.69 lower(1.17 lower to 0.22 lower)
WHOQOL-BREF - Psychological Health
 1120 (5 observational studies) not serious very serious a,c not serious serious d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 683 437 SMD 0.82 lower(1.4 lower to 0.24 lower)
WHOQOL-BREF - Social relationship
 1120 (5 observational studies) serious e serious a not serious serious d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 683 437 SMD 0.88 lower(1.46 lower to 0.29 lower)
WHOQOL-BREF - Environmental area
 1120 (5 observational studies) serious f serious a not serious serious d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 683 437 SMD 0.66 lower(1.26 lower to 0.07 lower)

Notes: SMD Standard mean difference, a Considerable heterogeneity; b Only studies with some risk of bias were included in this analysis; c There is wide variation in the effect estimates across studies with little or no overlap of confidence intervals associated with the effect estimates; d Upper and lower confidence limit crosses the effect size were greater than 0.5; e Effect and significance (p value) change after exclusion of studies with risk of bias (SMD -0.16 [−0.35, 0.03] p = 0.09); f Effect and significance (p value) change after exclusion of studies with risk of bias (SMD -0.10 [− 0.29, 0.09] p = 0.3)