Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;20:44. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1452-0

Table 8.

Evidence profile of quality of life of institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly for WHOQOL-OLD questionnaire

Certainty assessment Summary of findings
№ of participants
(studies)
Follow-up
Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Overall certainty of evidence Study event rates (%) Anticipated absolute effects
With NIE With IE Risk with NIE Risk difference with IE
WHOQOL-OLD
 2304 (2 observational studies) very serious a serious b not serious serious c all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 1650 654 SMD 1.13 lower(1.47 lower to 0.8 lower)
WHOQOL-OLD - Past, Present and Future Activities
 384 (2 observational studies) very serious a serious b not serious very serious c, d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 275 109 SMD 1.48 lower(2.44 lower to 0.52 lower)
WHOQOL-OLD - Death and dying
 384 (2 observational studies) serious a serious b not serious very serious c, d strong associationall plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 275 109 SMD 0.46 lower(1.04 lower to 0.11 higher)
WHOQOL-OLD – Intimicy
 384 (2 observational studies) very serious a serious b not serious very serious c, d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 275 109 SMD 1.15 lower(1.88 lower to 0.43 lower)
WHOQOL-OLD - Social Participation
 384 (2 observational studies) very serious a serious b not serious very serious c, d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 275 109 - SMD 1.29 lower(2.34 lower to 0.24 lower)
WHOQOL-OLD - Sensory Abilities
 384 (2 observational studies) very serious a serious b not serious very serious c, d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 275 109 SMD 1.06 lower(1.8 lower to 0.33 lower)
WHOQOL-OLD – Autonomy
 384 (2 observational studies) very serious a serious b not serious very serious c, d all plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed ⨁◯◯◯VERY LOW 275 109 - SMD 1.45 lower(3.49 lower to 0.6 higher)

Notes: SMD Standard mean difference, a Only studies with some risk of bias were included in this analysis; b Considerable heterogeneity; c Total number of participants is less than 400; d There is wide variation in the effect estimates across studies with little or no overlap of confidence intervals associated with the effect estimates