Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 5;20:12. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-0416-3

Table 2.

Efficacy of models for identifying mediastinal LNM in the training and validation groups

Model Group AUC SEN SPE ACC PPV NPV
1 training 0.926 0.879 0.860 0.871 0.906 0.821
validation 0.925 0.952 0.769 0.882 0.870 0.909
2 training 0.875 0.929 0.609 0.804 0.786 0.848
validation 0.876 0.976 0.423 0.765 0.732 0.917
3 training 0.857 0.919 0.469 0.742 0.728 0.789
validation 0.802 0.905 0.500 0.750 0.745 0.765
4 training 0.850 0.949 0.563 0.798 0.770 0.878
validation 0.813 0.952 0.423 0.750 0.727 0.846
5 training 0.831 0.879 0.594 0.767 0.770 0.760
validation 0.800 0.952 0.615 0.824 0.889 0.889
6 training 0.841 0.979 0.281 0.706 0.678 0.900
validation 0.702 0.928 0.192 0.647 0.650 0.625

SEN sensitivity, SPE specificity, ACC accuracy, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value