Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD002924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002924.pub2

Schull 1992.

Methods Randomised controlled trial ‐ but unclear whether study was blinded or how treatment was randomised.
Participants 60 patients with ischaemic stroke ‐ CP group 30, control group 30.
Interventions TREATMENT GROUP: case managed care with anticipatory comprehensive planning for each phase of admission; multidisciplinary care with pre‐defined goals, emotional support, patient education, discharge planning, and post‐discharge telephone follow‐up. CONTROL GROUP: undefined standard patient care.
Outcomes Mean LOS (days): CP=11.4 vs Control=14.3. Readmission <30 days: CP=1/30 vs Control=1/30. Emergency room visits <90 days: CP=1/30 vs Control=12/30. Mean follow‐up compliance (%): ICP=79 vs Control=56. Mean hospital cost ($): ICP=195143 vs Control=248605.
Notes Acute stroke and rehabilitation. Both groups similar in characteristics. Compliance to CP generally good.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear