Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003539.pub2

McIsaac 1998.

Methods RCT 
 unit of allocation: provider 
 unit of analysis: provider/episode of care (each provider contributed only one patient) 
 power calculation: done 
 concealment of allocation: not clear 
 follow up of professionals: not done 
 blinded assessment of outcome: not clear 
 baseline measurement: not done 
 reliable primary outcome measure: not clear 
 protection against contamination: not done 
 analysis appropriate: yes
Participants 396 family practitioners in Ontario, Canada treating patients over 15 years of age for sore throat
Interventions 1. Reminder (interactive component of scoring system) + Printed educational materials (sore throat scoring system with explicit management recommendations)
2. Printed educational materials (sore throat scoring system with explicit management recommendations)
Outcomes Professional practice: 
 Difference in rate of prescribing of oral antibiotics for sore throat
Difference in rate of prescribing first‐ and second‐line antibiotics
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear