McIsaac 1998.
Methods | RCT unit of allocation: provider unit of analysis: provider/episode of care (each provider contributed only one patient) power calculation: done concealment of allocation: not clear follow up of professionals: not done blinded assessment of outcome: not clear baseline measurement: not done reliable primary outcome measure: not clear protection against contamination: not done analysis appropriate: yes | |
Participants | 396 family practitioners in Ontario, Canada treating patients over 15 years of age for sore throat | |
Interventions | 1. Reminder (interactive component of scoring system) + Printed educational materials (sore throat scoring system with explicit management recommendations) 2. Printed educational materials (sore throat scoring system with explicit management recommendations) |
|
Outcomes | Professional practice:
Difference in rate of prescribing of oral antibiotics for sore throat Difference in rate of prescribing first‐ and second‐line antibiotics |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear |