O'Connell 1999.
Methods | RCT unit of allocation: postal code regions unit of analysis: episodes of care power calculation: done concealment of allocation: not clear follow up of professionals: not clear blinded assessment of primary outcome: done baseline measurement: done reliable primary outcome measure: done protection against contamination: done analysis appropriate: no | |
Participants | 2440 general practitioners grouped by postal code region in rural Australia treating patients of all ages with any community acquired infection | |
Interventions | 1. Printed educational materials + audit and feedback 2. No intervention control |
|
Outcomes | Professional practice:
Change in rate of prescribing antibiotics Patient: None |
|
Notes | Specific prescribing guidelines and recommendations not made | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear |