Rokstad 1995.
| Methods | CBA unit of allocation: region unit of analysis: episodes of care power calculation: not done baseline measurement: done characteristics for studies using second site as control: done blinded assessment of primary outcome: not clear protection against contamination: done reliable primary outcome measure: not clear follow up of professionals: done analysis appropriate: no | |
| Participants | 111 general practitioners from 2 regions of Norway treating adult women with urinary tract infection | |
| Interventions | 1. Audit and feedback + printed educational materials for treatment of urinary tract infection 2. Same intervention for treatment of insomnia |
|
| Outcomes | Professional practice:
Change in rate of prescribing recommended antibiotics Patient: None |
|
| Notes | Recommendations for prescribing made by local experts | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | D ‐ Not used |