Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003539.pub2

Seppala 1997.

Methods ITS 
 unit of allocation: not applicable 
 unit of analysis: prescriptions 
 protection against secular changes: not done 
 sufficient data points to enable reliable statistical inference: done 
 formal test for trend: not done 
 protection against detection bias: done 
 intervention unlikely to affect data collection: done 
 blinded assessment of primary outcome: done 
 completeness of data set: done 
 reliable primary outcome measure: done 
 analysis appropriate: no
Participants Physicians in Finland treating patients of all ages with respiratory or skin infections
Interventions 1. Printed educational materials (published national guidelines)
Outcomes Professional practice: 
 Frequency of prescribing macrolide antibiotics
Patient: 
 Frequency of isolation of erythromycin resistant Group A streptococci
Notes Guideline prepared by members of The Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial resistance
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk D ‐ Not used