Seppala 1997.
| Methods | ITS unit of allocation: not applicable unit of analysis: prescriptions protection against secular changes: not done sufficient data points to enable reliable statistical inference: done formal test for trend: not done protection against detection bias: done intervention unlikely to affect data collection: done blinded assessment of primary outcome: done completeness of data set: done reliable primary outcome measure: done analysis appropriate: no | |
| Participants | Physicians in Finland treating patients of all ages with respiratory or skin infections | |
| Interventions | 1. Printed educational materials (published national guidelines) | |
| Outcomes | Professional practice:
Frequency of prescribing macrolide antibiotics Patient: Frequency of isolation of erythromycin resistant Group A streptococci |
|
| Notes | Guideline prepared by members of The Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial resistance | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | D ‐ Not used |