Table 1.
Observational evidence | Examples | Considerations |
---|---|---|
Macroscopic carbonaceous stains (Vinther et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010; Smithwick et al., 2017) | Colour patterns (e.g., stripes, mottling, bars, 'bandit masks', countershading). | Absence of stains may be due to: (i) early taphonomic processes (e.g. scavenging, decay, physical perturbation); (ii) non‐pigmented integument; (iii) structurally coloured integument that lacks fossilisation potential through diagenesis; (iv) non‐melanin‐based pigmentation; (v) late taphonomic processes (e.g. oxidative weathering of organics). |
Melanosome morphology and organisation (Vinther et al., 2008, Li et al., 2010, 2012, Zhang et al., 2010) |
Aspect ratio, shape, and size from organic preservation or mouldic impression in sediment (e.g. oblong, oblate, platelet). Internal structure (e.g. solid/hollow). Arrangement of melanosomes relative to each other can reveal structural colouration (e.g. melanosome lattices). |
Melanosome organic structure can be lost through oxidative weathering or through aqueous conditions during thermal maturation/diagenesis.Thermal maturation/diagenesis results in some minor (<10%) shrinkage of melanosomes. Many structural colour arrays involve proteinaceous components that likely do not fossilise. |
Organic chemistry (Colleary et al., 2015) | Chemical signatures consistent with fossil pigment – precise signature dependent on the pigment and analytical technique used (e.g. secondary ions, pyrolysates, infrared absorption spectra, etc.). | Some sulphur moieties can be derived from phaeomelanin or from taphonomic incorporation of sulphur into eumelanin. Chemical makeup of biomolecules can alter during diagenesis. |