Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 21;29(2):209–222. doi: 10.1002/hec.3973

Table 2.

Effects of base rate changes on number of admissions

Log number of admissions
Baseline With additional trends Without Hesse and Bavaria No change of owner type Without covariates Without price competitors
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Δbase rate (2004–2009) −0.136** −0.138** −0.155*** −0.132** −0.133** −0.132**
(0.055) (0.057) (0.060) (0.058) (0.055) (0.055)
Year effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Regional characteristics Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Average price of competitors Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Trends by regional and hosp. charact. No Yes No No No No
Hospital fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
N (hospitals) 801 801 689 755 801 801

Note. The table shows estimation coefficients of a fixed effects linear regression model. The sample includes observations for the years 2004 and 2009. Δbase rate (2004–2009) is defined as log(base rate 2009) − log(base rate 2004). Regional indicators include average age of men, average age of women, population density, and unemployment rate. All regional characteristics are measured for a hospital's catchment area. Trends by regional and hospital characteristics are captured by interaction terms of an indicator for the year 2009 and the following regional and hospital characteristics (measured in the year 2004): average age of men, average age of women, population density, unemployment rate, large number of beds, a high Herfindahl index, public ownership, and not‐for‐profit ownership. The Herfindahl index refers to the year 2003. Parentheses show robust standard errors clustered at the hospital level.

*

Significant at 10%.

**

Significant at 5%.

***

Significant at 1%.