Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 15;658:854–860. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.221

Table 3.

Mediation analysis of the association between built environment and mental health measures in multivariable models.a

Mediator Direct effect (path E → O) Indirect effectb (path E → M → O) Percent mediatedc
Distance → depression
 Physical activity −0.030 (−0.052, −0.008)* −0.001 (−0.004,0.003) 2.1%
 Loneliness −0.020 (−0.039, 0.000)* −0.012 (−0.020, −0.004)* 40.7%
 Social support −0.029 (−0.051, −0.008)* −0.001 (−0.004,0.001) 3.5%
 PM2.5 −0.029 (−0.051, −0.006)* −0.002 (−0.003, 0.000)* 5.5%
 NO2d −0.024 (−0.054, 0.006) −0.001 (−0.004,0.001) 5.8%
Distance → anxiety
 Physical activity −0.016 (−0.031, −0.001)* 0.000 (−0.001,0.001) 1.3%
 Loneliness −0.009 (−0.023,0.005) −0.007 (−0.011, −0.002)* 42.2%
 Social support −0.016 (−0.031, −0.001)* 0.000 (−0.002, 0.001) 3.0%
 PM2.5 −0.015 (−0.030, 0.000) −0.001 (−0.003,0.000)* 8.7%
 NO2 −0.019 (−0.039, 0.001) −0.002 (−0.004,0.000)* 9.3%
Urbanicity → depression
 Physical activity 0.228 (−0.054,0.509) 0.065 (0.021,0.109)* 22.6%
 Loneliness 0.127 (−0.128, 0.382) 0.193 (0.087, 0.300)* 67.0%
 Social support 0.245 (−0.038, 0.529) 0.046 (0.012, 0.080)* 15.9%
 PM2.5 0.203 (−0.094,0.500) 0.084(0.007, 0.162)* 29.4%
 NO2 0.133 (−0.238, 0.504) 0.049 (−0.023,0.122) 26.9%
a

All effects were expressed as the mean difference of the perceived stress per 50 m or interquartile range (57.8%) increment in distance to roadway or urbanicity, respectively.

b

Indirect effect was calculated as the product of two regression coefficients: (coefficient of exposure with mediator as the dependent variable) × (coefficient of mediator with mental health score as the dependent variable and exposure as another predictor).

c

Bold text refers to the statistically significant percent of mediation according to Sobel test (pindirect < 0.05).

d

Mediation analysis treating nitrogen dioxide (NO2) as mediator was restricted to a subset of NSHAP participants that resided within 90 km from a U.S. EPA ambient monitor that measured NO2 concentrations.

*

p < 0.05.