Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD002978. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002978.pub2

Comparison 3. Any HRT versus placebo: vasomotor outcomes at 3 months.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Hot flush frequency/week 8 1036 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐19.38 [‐27.50, ‐11.25]
2 Hot flush frequency ‐ log transformed 8 1036 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.20 [‐1.63, ‐0.77]
3 HFWWS 2 432 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐48.14 [‐64.22, ‐32.07]
4 HFWWS ‐ log transformed 2 432 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.55 [‐2.92, ‐0.19]
5 Hot flush severity (0‐3 scale, continuous) ‐ WMD 4 237 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.67 [‐1.09, ‐0.26]
6 Hot flush severity (dichotomous) 6   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6.1 Presence versus absence of hot flushes 5 272 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.11 [0.05, 0.24]
6.2 Moderate‐severe versus mild‐absent hot flushes 3 254 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.17 [0.05, 0.65]
7 Hot flush severity (proportional odds ratios) 8 554 odds ratios (Random, 95% CI) 0.09 [0.05, 0.17]