Comparison 5. Hulka versus Filshie clip.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Minor morbidity: total	1	197	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.14 [0.00, 7.32]
2 Minor morbidity: details	2		Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
2.1 Procedure‐related injuries with no additional operation	2	2322	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.57 [0.73, 3.36]
2.2 Urogenital infection	1	1910	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	2.40 [0.62, 9.30]
2.3 Wound complications	1	1910	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.86 [0.63, 1.17]
3 Technical failures	2	2325	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.04 [0.10, 11.33]
4 Technical difficulties	2	2323	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.51 [1.09, 2.10]
5 Failure rate: total	1	1441	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	6.20 [0.75, 51.66]
6 Operative time	1	197	Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.70 [‐0.04, 1.44]
7 Complaints	1		Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
7.1 Postoperative pain < 24 h	1	197	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.74 [0.99, 3.03]