Toplis 1988.
Methods | Randomisation not specified. Concealment of allocation by envelope opened immediately before operation | |
Participants | 200 non pregnant women at the Churchill Hospital, Oxford | |
Interventions | Spring‐loaded clip (Hulka‐Clemens) versus Filshie clip (titanium clip) via laparoscopy | |
Outcomes | Operative morbidity, operative time, complaints | |
Notes | Interval sterilisation Authors as the only surgeons |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Concealment of allocation by envelope opened immediately before operation |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Two women from the Hulka clip group were excluded from the study because of technical failure |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Unable to determine |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Unable to determine. Women in the Filshie group were slightly heavier than those in the Hulka clip group |