Table 13. Comparison of SVM, LR, bagging SVM and bagging LR.
Machine Learning model | Feature selection / extraction | No. of features/dimension | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | Miss rate (%) | F1-score (%) | Testing accuracy (%) | ROC-AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM | No | 12 | 88.24 | 91.84 | 8.16 | 90 | 85.50 | 93.26 |
Filter based feature | 6 | 90 | 91.84 | 8.16 | 90.91 | 86.96 | 94.08 | |
PCA | 11 | 88.24 | 91.84 | 8.16 | 90 | 85.51 | ||
Bagging SVM (linear kernel with c = 7) | Filter based feature | 5 | 87.04 | 95.92 | 4.08 | 91.26 | 86.96 | 93.77 |
LR |
No | 12 | 89.80 | 89.80 | 10.20 | 89.80 | 85.51 | 93.67 |
Filter based feature | 5 | 90 | 91.84 | 8.16 | 90.91 | 86.96 | 94.48 | |
PCA | 11 | 89.80 | 89.80 | 10.20 | 89.80 | 85.51 | ||
Bagging LR | Filter based feature | 5 | 90 | 91.84 | 8.16 | 90.91 | 86.96 | 94.79 |