Table 3. Sociodemographic, behavioral, and occupational safety attributes of Croatian fish processing workers (n = 600) associated with the anti-Anisakis seropositivity at the significance level of 0.1.
Attribute | OR | 95% CI for OR | p-valuea | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sociodemographic | Male gender | 3.4 | 1.1 | 11.1 | 0.042 | |
Older age [years] | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.091 | ||
Occupational safety | Wears protective gloves | 0.6 | 0.1 | 5.6 | 0.581 | |
face mask | 0.2 | 0.001 | 1.3 | 0.094† | ||
goggles | 0.7 | 0.01 | 5.3 | 0.762 | ||
Direct contact with fish | 2.6 | 0.6 | 24.4 | 0.152 | ||
Behavior | Fishes in free time | 11.4 | 3.5 | 38.7 | < 0.001 | |
Fish processing technique used at home to prepare fish | ||||||
Marinates | 6.7 | 1.2 | 25.7 | 0.031 | ||
Prepares raw fish | 9.0 | 0.9 | 46.0 | 0.059† | ||
Salts | NA | |||||
Smokes | NA | |||||
Cooks | 1.8 | 0.6 | 6.4 | 0.317 | ||
Grills | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.235 | ||
Fish prepared and consumed at | ||||||
Home | 1.0 | 0.1 | >50 | 0.974 | ||
Restaurant | 4.8 | 0.5 | 22.7 | 0.144 | ||
Supermarket | 0.7 | 0.01 | 5.6 | 0.977 | ||
Diet | ||||||
Eats meat | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.6 | 0.023 | ||
Consumes fish less than once weekly | 0.1 | 0.001 | 0.8 | 0.021 | ||
Consumes fish (YES/NO) | 0.6 | 0.1 | 82.3 | 0.768 | ||
Consumes thermally unprocessed fish | 2.3 | 0.7 | 8.1 | 0.162 | ||
Type of fish consumed: | ||||||
marine finfish | 1.1 | 0.3 | 3.6 | 0.835 | ||
small marine pelagic fish | 0.6 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 0.508 | ||
freshwater | 2.4 | 0.3 | 10.7 | 0.376 | ||
Smoking | ||||||
Non-smokers vs smokers | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.4 | p = 0.51 | Overall, for all categories | |
Ex-smokers vs smokers | 4.5 | 1.0 | 17.6 | p = 0.05 | p = 0.060 |
See the Methods section for the rationale of the significance level
aShown is the p-value of logistic regression model’s likelihood ratio test. All findings are additionally supported with the Fisher’s exact p-value < 0.1, except for the p-values marked with † for which Fisher exact test reaches a p-value between 0.1 and 0.2.