TABLE 2.
Combinations between parameters of the model hypothesized in SRL vs. ERL Theory: the Utility ModelTM (de la Fuente et al., 2019, p. 12).
|
Combination Levels |
Regulation mean/rank | Regulation Range |
Emotions Stress |
Coping Facors and Effect | Strateg.* | |||
| SR Level (range) | RT Level (range) | > | < | |||||
| 3 (3.85 – 5.00) H | 3 (2.84 – 5.00) H | 3.0/5 | High-High: High Regulation | ++ | − | Low | +Pr/−Em | |
| 2 (3.10 – 3.84) M | 3 (2.84 – 5.00) H | 2.5/4 | Medium-High: Regulation | + | − | M-L | +Pr/−Em | |
| 3 (3.85 – 5.00) H | 2 (2.35 – 2.83) M | 2.5/4 | High-Medium: Regulation | + | − | M-L | +Pr/−Em | |
| 2 (3.10 – 3.84) M | 2 (2.35 – 2.83) M | 2.0/3 | Medium: Non-regulation | + | − | M | =Pr/ = Em | |
| 2(3.10 – 3.84) M | 1 (1.00 – 2.34) L | 1.5/2 | Medium-Low: Dysregulation | − | = | + | M-H | +Em/−Pr |
| 1 (1.00 – 3.09) L | 2 (2.35 – 2.83) M | 1.5/2 | Low-Medium: Dysregulation | − | + | M-H | +Em/−Pr | |
| 1 (1.00 – 3.09) L | 1 (1.00 – 2.34) L | 1.0/1 | Low-Low: High Dysregulation | − − | + | High | +Em/−Pr | |
H, High; M, Medium; L, Low; Emotions: + (positives) vs. − (negatives). *Dependent Variable in this study: Coping Strategies: Pr, Problem-focused Coping; Em, Emotion-focused Coping.