Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 6;10:1969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58855-1

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Study & Year Nation No. of patient (M/F) Age (yr),mean (range) Patient enrollment No. of lesion Study design Blind Analysis method Reference standard
Brendle (2016) Germany 15 (9/6) 45 (10–62) C 37 Retro Y Qualitative H/IF
Cantwell (2008) USA 33 (22/11) 63 NC 110 Retro Y Semiquantitative H/IF
Chiaradia (2014) France 15 (8/7) 64 (38–88) C 79 Retro Y Quantitative & Qualitative H
Cho (2015) Korea 65 (35/30) 66.6 NR 121 Retro NR Qualitative H/IF
Colagrande (2016) Italy 54 (35/19) 69.5 (47–75) NC 135 Retro Y Qualitative IOUS & H
Hwang (2018) Korea 175 (115/60) 59.3 C 474 Retro Y Semiquantitative H
Kartalis (2011) Sweden 15 (7/8) 64 ± 8 NR 40 Retro Y Qualitative H/IF
Kong (2008) UK 65 (42/23) 65* NR 171 Retro Y NR H/IF
Mainenti (2010) Italy 34 (20/14) 63 (29–81) C 57 Retro Y Qualitative BP/IOUS/H/IF
Oba (2018) Japan 59 (42/17) 59 (30–81) C 275 Retro Y NR H/IF
Rappeport (2007) Denmark 35 (16/19) 62* (33–74) C 124 Pro Y Qualitative H/IF/IOUS
Rojas (2014) Italy 51 (31/20) 65* (28–79) NC 156 Retro NR Qualitative H
Said (2000) USA 19 (12/7) 53 (32–73) NR 39 NR Y Qualitative H
Schulz (2016) Norway 46 (29/17) 67* (33–85) NR 336 Pro Y Qualitative H/IF
Shiozawa (2017) Japan 69 (46/23) 66 (34–86) NR 133 NR Y Semiquantitative H/IF
Sivesgaard (2018) Denmark 80 (47/33) 68* (29–86) C 533 Pro Y Semiquantitative H/IF/IOUS/CE-CT
Zerhouni (1996) USA 166(NR) NR NR 459 NR Y Semiquantitative H/IF

*Median age; BP: bimanual palpation; C: consecutive; CE-CT: contrast-enhanced computed tomography; H: histopathology; IF: imaging follow–up; IOUS: intraoperative ultrasonography; NC: non-consecutive; NR: not reported; Pro: prospective; Retro: retrospective; Y: yes.